Avoidable Ignorance and the Role of Cochrane and Campbell Reviews.
The Campbell and Cochrane Collaborations were created to reveal the evidentiary status of claims focusing especially on the effectiveness of specific interventions. Such reviews are constrained by the population of studies available and biases that may influence this availability such as preferred f...
| Publicado en: | Research on Social Work Practice Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 147 - 164 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
Jan2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=100028842&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 100028842 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 10497315 RSW jtl: Research on Social Work Practice issn: 10497315 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jan2015 vid: 25 iid: 1 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. artinfo: ui: 100028842 10.1177/1049731514533731 ppf: 147 ppct: 17 formats: tig: atl: Avoidable Ignorance and the Role of Cochrane and Campbell Reviews. aug: au: Gambrill, Eileen affil: University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA gambrill@berkeley.edu su: Deception Health attitudes Intellect Interprofessional relations Recognition (Psychology) Uncertainty Systematic reviews Problem solving methodology Information storage & retrieval systems Medical databases Research Research evaluation Evidence-based medicine Professional practice Research bias sug: subj: Deception Health attitudes Intellect Interprofessional relations Recognition (Psychology) Uncertainty Systematic reviews Problem solving methodology Information storage & retrieval systems Medical databases Research Research evaluation Evidence-based medicine Professional practice Research bias keyword: avoidable ignorance Campbell reviews Cochrane reviews decisions ethics evidence-based practice problem-framing avoidable ignorance Campbell reviews Cochrane reviews decisions ethics evidence-based practice problem-framing ab: The Campbell and Cochrane Collaborations were created to reveal the evidentiary status of claims focusing especially on the effectiveness of specific interventions. Such reviews are constrained by the population of studies available and biases that may influence this availability such as preferred framing of problems. This highlights the importance of attending to how problems are framed and the validity of measures used in such reviews, as well as the importance of reviews focusing on questions concerning problem framing and the accuracy of measures. Neglecting such questions, both within reviews of effectiveness and in separate reviews concerning related claims, results in lost opportunities to decrease avoidable ignorance. Domains of avoidable ignorance are suggested using examples of Cochrane/Campbell reviews. Without attention to problem framing, systematic reviews may contribute to maintaining avoidable ignorance. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|