Deontic Modals: Why Abandon the Classical Semantics?
I begin by reviewing classical semantics and the problems presented by normative conflicts. After a brief detour through default logic, I establish some connections between the treatment of conflicts in each of these two approaches, classical and default, and then move on to consider some further is...
| Publicado en: | Pacific Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 95; no. 4; pp. 424 - 461 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Dec2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=100101485&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 100101485 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 02790750 PHZ jtl: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly issn: 02790750 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Dec2014 vid: 95 iid: 4 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 100101485 10.1111/papq.12044 ppf: 424 ppct: 37 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 402KB tig: atl: Deontic Modals: Why Abandon the Classical Semantics? aug: au: Horty, John affil: Philosophy Department, University of Maryland su: Deontic logic Modal logic Semantics Conditionals (Logic) Reasoning sug: subj: Deontic logic Modal logic Semantics Conditionals (Logic) Reasoning ab: I begin by reviewing classical semantics and the problems presented by normative conflicts. After a brief detour through default logic, I establish some connections between the treatment of conflicts in each of these two approaches, classical and default, and then move on to consider some further issues: priorities among norms, or reasons, conditional oughts, and reasons about reasons. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Pacific Philosophical Quarterly is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2014 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|