Galen and the Ontology of Powers.

What, for Galen, are powers, and how are they to be properly individuated? The notion of a power or capacity (dunamis) does a great deal of work in Galen. As in Aristotle, the concept of adunamisis tightly linked with that of anenergeia, but these are not simply logical abstractions. Rather the natu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:British Journal for the History of Philosophy Vol. 22; no. 5; pp. 951 - 974
Autor principal: Hankinson, Robert J.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Sep2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=100355419&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 100355419
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09608788
        5AX
      jtl: British Journal for the History of Philosophy
      issn: 09608788
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2014
      vid: 22
      iid: 5
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        100355419
        10.1080/09608788.2014.988118
      ppf: 951
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 180KB
      tig:
        atl: Galen and the Ontology of Powers.
      aug:
        au: Hankinson, Robert J.
        affil: University of Texas at Austin
      su:
        Ontology
        Power (Philosophy)
        Etiology of diseases
        History of physiology
      sug:
        subj:
          Ontology
          Power (Philosophy)
          Etiology of diseases
          History of physiology
      keyword:
        disease
        Galen
        ontology
        physiology
        powers
      ab: What, for Galen, are powers, and how are they to be properly individuated? The notion of a power or capacity (dunamis) does a great deal of work in Galen. As in Aristotle, the concept of adunamisis tightly linked with that of anenergeia, but these are not simply logical abstractions. Rather the naturalenergeiaiare the basic functional activities of the animal body and its parts, and just as health consists in proper functioning, so disease is defined as ‘damage to one of the naturalenergeiaiof the body’, and these activities are damaged when something interferes with its relateddunamis. Here I try to make sense of the apparently very different things Galen says regardingdunameis. For example, he says that they do not inhabit our bodies as we do our houses; that is, presumably, they are not substantial or hypostasized; rather they are properties of us. Equally, he is perfectly clear that they are relational items: a power is a power for affecting something determinate in some determinate way. They are also said to be efficient causes. But it is not clear how these different strands fit together.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of British Journal for the History of Philosophy is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: British Journal for the History of Philosophy
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2014
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N