NEVERBALINIO KONTINUUMO HIPOTEZĖ: PRASMĖ KAIP ĮGIMTAS GEBĖJIMAS INTERPRETUOTI?

This paper is dedicated to a critical discussion of the logical-philosophical conceptions of language that are presented in Rolandas Pavilionis' book Language. Logic. Philosophy, its primary focus being an analysis of Pavilionis' hypothesis of meaning as nonverbal continuous system. The paper consis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Problems / Problemos pp. 29 - 39
Autor principal: Gilaitis, Mindaugas
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Vilnius University 2014 Supplement
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=100424167&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 100424167
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13921126
        3D4C
      jtl: Problems / Problemos
      issn: 13921126
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2014 Supplement
      pid: 16037
      pub: Vilnius University
    artinfo:
      ui:
        100424167
        10.15388/problemos.2014.0.4922
      ppf: 29
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 2MB
      tig:
        atl: NEVERBALINIO KONTINUUMO HIPOTEZĖ: PRASMĖ KAIP ĮGIMTAS GEBĖJIMAS INTERPRETUOTI?
      aug:
        au: Gilaitis, Mindaugas
        affil: Vilniaus universiteto, Filosofijos istorijos ir logikos katedra, Universiteto g. 9/1, LT-01513 Vilnius
      sug:
      keyword:
        "Language. Logic. Philosophy"
        continuous conceptual system
        theories of meaning
        "Language. Logic. Philosophy"
        „Kalba. Logi-ka. Filosofija“
        continuous conceptual system
        prasmės kaip neverbalinio kontinuumo hipotezė
        prasmės teorijos
        Rolandas Pavilionis
        theories of meaning
      ab:
        This paper is dedicated to a critical discussion of the logical-philosophical conceptions of language that are presented in Rolandas Pavilionis' book Language. Logic. Philosophy, its primary focus being an analysis of Pavilionis' hypothesis of meaning as nonverbal continuous system. The paper consists of two parts. Two types of theories of meaning are distinguished and an analysis of the discussed conceptions of natural languages is proposed in the first, analytic, part of the paper: assumptions that are relevant for the philosophical semantics are identified and used for clarification of the presuppositions of the alternative semantic programme advanced by Pavilionis. Two shortcomings of Pavilionis' semantic theory are presented in the second, critical, part of the paper. First, it is maintained that Pavilionis' theory of understanding, which suggests taking the notion of interpretation as fundamental, is unacceptable: interpretation is an enabling, not a constitutive condition of understanding. Second, due to the lack of discussion of the epistemic aspects of meaning and the relation between concepts and conceptual capacities, it remains unclear what theoretical value can be carried by the idea of innate concepts and how can it be made compatible with externalistic aspects of this semantic theory.
        Šiuo straipsniu siekiama kritiškai aptarti Rolando Pavilionio knygoje „Kalba. Logika. Filosofija“ analizuojamas logines-filosofines kalbos koncepcijas, pagrindinį dėmesį skiriant Pavilionio prasmės kaip neverbalinio kontinuumo hipotezės analizei. Straipsnį sudaro dvi dalys. Pirmoje, analitinėje, dalyje išskiriami du prasmės teorijų tipai bei atliekama knygoje kritiškai aptariamų natūralios kalbos koncepcijų analizė: įvardijamos filosofinei semantikai reikšmingos šių koncepcijų prielaidos, kurių pagrindu speci- fikuojamos Pavilionio siūlomos alternatyvios semantinių tyrimų programos teorinės prielaidos. Antroje, kritinėje, dalyje išskiriami du Pavilionio semantikos teorijos trūkumai. Pirma, teigiama, jog Pavilionio supratimo teorija, interpretacijos sąvoką siūlanti laikyti fundamentalia, yra nepriimtina: interpretacija yra ne supratimą steigianti, o jį įgalinanti sąlyga. Antra, kadangi nėra episteminių prasmės aspektų bei konceptų ir konceptualinių gebėjimų santykio aptarties, lieka neaišku, kokią teorinę vertę turi įgimtų konceptų idėja bei kaip ši idėja gali būti suderinama su eksternalistiniais šios semantikos teorijos aspektais.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Lithuanian
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Problems / Problemos
      holder: Vilnius University
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2014
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N