DELINEATING THE MORAL DOMAIN IN MORAL PSYCHOLOGY.
The aim of this paper is to review current debate about the moral domain in the moral psychological literature. There is some vagueness in respect to the usage of the very concept of 'morality'. This conceptual problem recently has been re-addressed by several authors. So far, there is little agreem...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos pp. 90 - 102 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2014 Supplement
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=100424173&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 100424173 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2014 Supplement pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 100424173 ppf: 90 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 2.4MB tig: atl: DELINEATING THE MORAL DOMAIN IN MORAL PSYCHOLOGY. aug: au: Berniūnas, Renatas affil: Department of General Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, Universiteto str. 9/1, LT-01513 Vilnius su: Moral psychology Psychological literature Vagueness (Philosophy) Conceptual models Normativity (Ethics) Debate sug: subj: Moral psychology Psychological literature Vagueness (Philosophy) Conceptual models Normativity (Ethics) Debate keyword: moral domain moral psychology moralės psichologija moralės sritis normative cognition normatyvinis pažinimas moralės psichologija moralės sritis normatyvinis pažinimas ab: The aim of this paper is to review current debate about the moral domain in the moral psychological literature. There is some vagueness in respect to the usage of the very concept of 'morality'. This conceptual problem recently has been re-addressed by several authors. So far, there is little agreement, nobody seems to agree about how to delineate the moral domain from other 'non-moral' normative domains. Currently, there are several positions that disagree about the scope of morality, ranging from complete monists to complete pluralists. The paper will review these positions and will tentatively suggest further directions to test their claims. At this moment, there is no decisive evidence for either position. Straipsnio tikslas yra apžvelgti šiuolaikinę moralės psichologijos literatūrą, kurioje yra aptariama moralės sritis. Šiuo metu psichologai nesutaria, kaip geriau apibrėžti moralės terminą ir kaip atskirti moralinę nuo nemoralinės normatyvinės srities. Šiais klausimais yra kelios prieštaraujančios pozicijos: psichologas Elliotas Turielis teigia, kad moralės pagrindą sudaro žalos ir teisingumo sąvokos, o monistai bando suvesti visą moralę tik į vieną -- arba žalą, arba teisingumą. Galiausiai pliuralistai išskiria bent penkis moralės pagrindus. Straipsnis apžvelgs šias pozicijas ir pasiūlys galimus šių pozicijų teorinio pagrįstumo tikrinimo būdus. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2014 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|