Political Religion and Religious Policy: How the Hittite King Chose His Patron Gods.

The manner in which Hittite kings chose the supreme deities of the state or the dynastic pantheon to be their divine patrons must be considered in terms of 'political religion'. In the Old Hittite Period, the king was empowered to rule by contract with the Storm-god of Ḫatti and the Sun-goddess of A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Altorientalische Forschungen (0232-8461) Vol. 40; no. 2; pp. 373 - 385
Autor principal: Taracha, Piotr
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: De Gruyter Dec2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=100860546&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 100860546
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02328461
        FS3Y
      jtl: Altorientalische Forschungen (0232-8461)
      issn: 02328461
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2013
      vid: 40
      iid: 2
      pid: 1734
      pub: De Gruyter
    artinfo:
      ui:
        100860546
        10.1524/aof.2013.0019
      ppf: 373
      ppct: 12
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Political Religion and Religious Policy: How the Hittite King Chose His Patron Gods.
      aug:
        au: Taracha, Piotr
        affil: The University of Warsaw The Faculty of Oriental Studies Department of Ancient Near Eastern Studies Krakowskie Przedmiesćie 26/28 PL - 00-927 Warszawa
      su:
        Hittite gods
        Hittites -- Religion
        Kings & rulers
        Hittite goddesses
        Religion & politics
      sug:
        subj:
          Hittite gods
          Hittites -- Religion
          Kings & rulers
          Hittite goddesses
          Religion & politics
      keyword:
        Hittite kingship
        king's patron gods
        political religion
        state and royal ideology
      ab: The manner in which Hittite kings chose the supreme deities of the state or the dynastic pantheon to be their divine patrons must be considered in terms of 'political religion'. In the Old Hittite Period, the king was empowered to rule by contract with the Storm-god of Ḫatti and the Sun-goddess of Arinna, the supreme deities of the state pantheon. Furthermore, the War-god and the Throne-goddess were connected in particular with the ideology of kingship in the original Hattian tradition. Changes in Hittite 'political religion' during the Empire Period resulted in a change of royal ideology.This new ideology is to be attributed to Mesopotamian ideas relating to concepts of royal legitimacy based on the authority of the Sun-god as a guardian of the cosmic order.Yet, the Hurrianized dynasty of the Empire Period had the Storm-god Teššub as its divine protector. Hence, it was Teššub and not the Sun-god who was a natural choice for the patron god of Hittite kings. Mursili II and Muwattalli II conceived a number of hypostases of Teššub with various Luwian and Hurrian epithets as their divine protectors, perceived to be identical with the supreme god of the state and dynasty. In this connection, worthy of note is the political career of Ḫattusili III, who had chosen his patron deities, the Storm-god of Nerik and šauška of Samuḫ, long before his accession to the Great Kingship of Ḫatti.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2013
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N