Unixed.

Is the escalating legal dispute between IBM and SCO Group, an obscure Utah software company, more than a storm in a teacup? At issue is the tangled heritage of the Unix operating system, and its relationship to Linux, a free operating system built by programmers collaborating via the internet. Bat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Economist Vol. 367; no. 8329; p. 56
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Economist Newspaper Limited 6/21/2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=10089277&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 10089277
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00130613
        ECO
      jtl: Economist
      issn: 00130613
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 6/21/2003
      vid: 367
      iid: 8329
      pid: 161
      pub: Economist Newspaper Limited
    artinfo:
      ui: 10089277
      ppf: 56
      ppct: 0
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Unixed.
      aug:
      su:
        International Business Machines Corp.
        SCO Group Inc.
        Computer operating systems
        Open Group LLC
        Contracts
        Actions & defenses (Law)
      sug:
        subj:
          International Business Machines Corp.
          SCO Group Inc.
          Computer operating systems
          Open Group LLC
          Contracts
          Actions & defenses (Law)
      ab: Is the escalating legal dispute between IBM and SCO Group, an obscure Utah software company, more than a storm in a teacup? At issue is the tangled heritage of the Unix operating system, and its relationship to Linux, a free operating system built by programmers collaborating via the internet. Battle commenced in March 2003, when SCO accused IBM of illegally copying code from Unix into Linux, and claimed $1 billion in damages. On June 16th, SCO revoked IBM's original contract with AT&T, filed for an injunction requiring IBM to recall and destroy all copies of AIX and raised its damages claim to $3 billion. By casting doubt on the legality of Linux, and suing a deep-pocketed company that has championed its use, SCO seems to be trying to get IBM to buy it off. Other firms have sought to capitalize on the confusion. In May, Microsoft signed a licensing deal with SCO, indirectly supporting its attack on Linux and other open-source software, which poses a long-term threat to Microsoft's proprietary kind.
      pubtype: Periodical
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2003
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N