User Evaluation of the Fitness-to-Drive Screening Measure.
Aims: The Fitness-to-Drive Screening Measure (FTDS) enables a proxy rater, such as a family member, to identify at-risk older drivers. This study addressed user evaluation of the web-based FTDS including the keyform (summary page) and recommendations. Methods: Eight participants reviewed the refined...
| Publicado en: | Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 64 - 72 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Mar2015
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=100990163&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 100990163 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 02703181 PTG jtl: Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics issn: 02703181 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2015 vid: 33 iid: 1 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 100990163 103759170 10.3109/02703181.2014.988322 100990163 ppf: 64 ppct: 8 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: User Evaluation of the Fitness-to-Drive Screening Measure. aug: au: Winter, Sandra M. Classen, Sherrilene Shanahan, Megan affil: Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA sug: subj: Automobile Driving Evaluation Clinical Assessment Tools Human Visual Analog Scaling Data Collection, Computer Assisted Purposive Sample Focus Groups Audiorecording Descriptive Statistics Data Analysis Software Male Female Middle Age Aged Funding Source Middle Aged: 45-64 years Aged: 65+ years Male Female ab: Aims: The Fitness-to-Drive Screening Measure (FTDS) enables a proxy rater, such as a family member, to identify at-risk older drivers. This study addressed user evaluation of the web-based FTDS including the keyform (summary page) and recommendations. Methods: Eight participants reviewed the refined web-based measure, and rated the clarity, usefulness, understandability, and meaningfulness of the FTDS. We captured participants' comments on the FTDS along with visual analog scale (VAS) ratings. Results: Overall, participants positively rated the FTDS as user-friendly, useful, and acceptable; an evaluation supported by the VAS rating (mean = 9.13, SD ± 1.10). Conclusions: Future research will include monitoring end-user satisfaction via an anonymous on-line survey. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|