The Real Software Crisis: Repeatability as a Core Value.
The authors argue that where appropriate, research papers in computer programming should be accompanied by software artifacts that let others test the repeatability of researchers' claims. The authors summarize results of an artifact evaluation process begun on an experimental basis at conferences o...
| Publicado en: | Communications of the ACM Vol. 58; no. 3; pp. 34 - 37 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Opinion |
| Publicado: |
Association for Computing Machinery
Mar2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=101119727&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 101119727 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00010782 ACM jtl: Communications of the ACM issn: 00010782 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2015 vid: 58 iid: 3 pid: 68 pub: Association for Computing Machinery artinfo: ui: 101119727 10.1145/2658987 ppf: 34 ppct: 3 formats: tig: atl: The Real Software Crisis: Repeatability as a Core Value. aug: au: Krishnamurthi, Shriram Vitek, Jan affil: Professor of computer science, Brown University in Providence, RI Professor of computer science, Northeastern University, Boston, MA su: Programming languages Scholarly publishing Computer science research Association for Computing Machinery Science publishing Computer software sug: subj: Programming languages Scholarly publishing Computer science research Association for Computing Machinery Science publishing Computer software ab: The authors argue that where appropriate, research papers in computer programming should be accompanied by software artifacts that let others test the repeatability of researchers' claims. The authors summarize results of an artifact evaluation process begun on an experimental basis at conferences of the Association of Computing Machinery, and provide commentary the mechanics of evaluating artifacts, who the evaluators should be, and the benefits of the evaluation process. Consideration is also given to whether artifacts should be published. pubtype: Periodical doctype: Opinion src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2015 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|