LEGITIMIZING CLAIMS FOR ‘CRISIS’ LEADERSHIP IN GLOBAL GOVERNANCE.
This paper explores the discursive processes of legitimizing leadership claims in the context of the nuclear proliferation crisis. Three complementary analyses of texts are carried out: discourse analyses of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions and relevant speeches by members of the U...
| Publicado en: | Critical Discourse Studies Vol. 12; no. 2; pp. 187 - 206 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
May2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=101516809&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 101516809 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 17405904 RF5 jtl: Critical Discourse Studies issn: 17405904 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: May2015 vid: 12 iid: 2 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 101516809 10.1080/17405904.2014.974636 ppf: 187 ppct: 19 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 416KB tig: atl: LEGITIMIZING CLAIMS FOR ‘CRISIS’ LEADERSHIP IN GLOBAL GOVERNANCE. aug: au: Schnurr, Stephanie Homolar, Alexandra MacDonald, Malcolm N. Rethel, Lena affil: Centre for Applied Linguistics, The University of Warwick, CV4 7AL, Coventry, UK Department of Politics and International Studies, The University of Warwick, CV4 7AL, Coventry, UK su: Nuclear nonproliferation Leadership United Nations. Security Council Discursive practices International relations sug: subj: Nuclear nonproliferation Leadership United Nations. Security Council Discursive practices International relations keyword: crisis discourse international politics leadership media nuclear security UNSC ab: This paper explores the discursive processes of legitimizing leadership claims in the context of the nuclear proliferation crisis. Three complementary analyses of texts are carried out: discourse analyses of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions and relevant speeches by members of the US administration, as well as a corpus analysis of news media accounts of nuclear proliferation published in prominent US and UK broadsheets. Findings suggest that leadership claims are legitimized through a range of discursive strategies, which are echoed across the different text types. However, a combination and comparison of the different datasets puts these findings into perspective and reveals that the various contexts and text types in which these leadership claims are made differ remarkably in terms of their use of relevant terms relating to leadership and crisis. We argue that this dynamic is best captured by the notion of an (inter)discursive chain of legitimization. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Critical Discourse Studies is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Critical Discourse Studies holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2015 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|