GROŽIO PATRAUKLUMAS.
This paper analyses how Mickūnas's philosophy reveals the relationship between aesthetics and Eros. The purpose of this analysis is to show that aesthetics and Eros do not require representation, but presentation, and why these two aspects are related to the direct expression of world experience. Th...
| Published in: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 87; pp. 94 - 106 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Vilnius University
2015
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=101706873&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 101706873 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2015 vid: 87 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 101706873 ppf: 94 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 2.2MB tig: atl: GROŽIO PATRAUKLUMAS. aug: au: Jonkus, Dalius affil: Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto, Filosofijos katedra, Donelaičio g. 52, LT-44261 Kaunas sug: keyword: aesthetic beauty intentionality phenomenology aesthetic beauty eros estetika fenomenologija grožis intencionalumas intentionality phenomenology ab: This paper analyses how Mickūnas's philosophy reveals the relationship between aesthetics and Eros. The purpose of this analysis is to show that aesthetics and Eros do not require representation, but presentation, and why these two aspects are related to the direct expression of world experience. The phenomenological analysis of aesthetics and Eros reveals the beauty of the world and its erotic appeal. Mickūnas argues that the aesthetic-erotic attitude is openness to the world's moods, rhythms and styles of being. On the other hand, he denies that the aesthetic and erotic experience is intentional, since the former is understood as a purposeful orientation to objects and an aim to identify the meaning of the object. In this paper I present arguments why Mickūnas's attempt to deny the intentionality of erotic and aesthetic experience is based on the narrow, rather than broad, concept of intentionality. Straipsnyje analizuojama, kaip Mickūno filosofija atskleidžia estetikos ir eroso sąryšį. Analizės tikslas -- parodyti, kad estetika ir erosas reikalauja ne reprezentacijos, bet prezentacijos ir kodėl abi šios plotmės yra susijusios su tiesiogine pasaulio išraiškų patirtimi. Fenomenologinė estetikos ir eroso analizė atskleidžia paties pasaulio grožį ir erotinį patrauklumą. Mickūnas teigia, kad estetinė-erotinė nuostata yra atvirumas paties pasaulio nuotaikoms, ritmams ir buvimo stiliams. Kita vertus, jis neigia estetinės ir erotinės patirties intencionalumą, nes pastarąjį supranta kaip tikslingą nukreiptumą į objektus ir siekį identifikuoti objekto reikšmę. Straipsnyje pateikiami argumentai, kodėl Mickūno bandymas paneigti erotinės ir estetinės patirties intencionalumą yra paremtas siaurąja, o ne plačiąja intencionalumo samprata. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Lithuanian refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2015 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|