Effectiveness of a Theoretically-Based Judgment and Decision Making Intervention for Adolescents.

Although adolescents demonstrate capacity for rational decision making, their tendency to be impulsive, place emphasis on peers, and ignore potential consequences of their actions often translates into higher risk-taking including drug use, illegal activity, and physical harm. Problems with judgment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Youth & Adolescence Vol. 44; no. 5; pp. 1024 - 1039
Autores principales: Knight, Danica, Dansereau, Donald, Becan, Jennifer, Rowan, Grace, Flynn, Patrick
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature May2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=101989366&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 101989366
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00472891
        JYA
      jtl: Journal of Youth & Adolescence
      issn: 00472891
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2015
      vid: 44
      iid: 5
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        101989366
        10.1007/s10964-014-0127-6
      ppf: 1024
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 262KB
      tig:
        atl: Effectiveness of a Theoretically-Based Judgment and Decision Making Intervention for Adolescents.
      aug:
        au:
          Knight, Danica
          Dansereau, Donald
          Becan, Jennifer
          Rowan, Grace
          Flynn, Patrick
        affil: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University (TCU), Fort Worth 76129 USA
      su:
        Counseling
        Substance abuse treatment
        Decision making
        Analysis of variance
        Black people
        Hispanic Americans
        Judgment (Psychology)
        White people
        Adolescence
        Probability theory
        Research funding
        Statistics
        Thought & thinking
        Data analysis
        Repeated measures design
        Data analysis software
        Descriptive statistics
      sug:
        subj:
          Counseling
          Substance abuse treatment
          Decision making
          Analysis of variance
          Black people
          Hispanic Americans
          Judgment (Psychology)
          White people
          Adolescence
          Other Individual and Family Services
          Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals
          Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Centers
          Probability theory
          Research funding
          Statistics
          Thought & thinking
          Data analysis
          Repeated measures design
          Data analysis software
          Descriptive statistics
      keyword:
        Adolescents
        Intervention
        Judgment and decision making
        Substance use
        Thinking
        Treatment
        Adolescents
        Intervention
        Judgment and decision making
        Substance use
        Thinking
        Treatment
      ab: Although adolescents demonstrate capacity for rational decision making, their tendency to be impulsive, place emphasis on peers, and ignore potential consequences of their actions often translates into higher risk-taking including drug use, illegal activity, and physical harm. Problems with judgment and decision making contribute to risky behavior and are core issues for youth in treatment. Based on theoretical and empirical advances in cognitive science, the Treatment Readiness and Induction Program (TRIP) represents a curriculum-based decision making intervention that can be easily inserted into a variety of content-oriented modalities as well as administered as a separate therapeutic course. The current study examined the effectiveness of TRIP for promoting better judgment among 519 adolescents (37 % female; primarily Hispanic and Caucasian) in residential substance abuse treatment. Change over time in decision making and premeditation (i.e., thinking before acting) was compared among youth receiving standard operating practice (n = 281) versus those receiving standard practice plus TRIP (n = 238). Change in TRIP-specific content knowledge was examined among clients receiving TRIP. Premeditation improved among youth in both groups; TRIP clients showed greater improvement in decision making. TRIP clients also reported significant increases over time in self-awareness, positive-focused thinking (e.g., positive self-talk, goal setting), and recognition of the negative effects of drug use. While both genders showed significant improvement, males showed greater gains in metacognitive strategies (i.e., awareness of one's own cognitive process) and recognition of the negative effects of drug use. These results suggest that efforts to teach core thinking strategies and apply/practice them through independent intervention modules may benefit adolescents when used in conjunction with content-based programs designed to change problematic behaviors.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N