'Honor Among (the Beneficiaries of) Thieves'.

Traditional accounts of the fair play principle suggest that, under appropriate conditions, those who benefit from the cooperative labor of others acquire an obligation of repayment. However, these accounts have had little to say about the nature of such obligations within morally or legally problem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ethical Theory & Moral Practice Vol. 18; no. 2; pp. 385 - 403
Main Author: Meketa, Irina
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature Apr2015
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=102077934&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 102077934
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13862820
        OEY
      jtl: Ethical Theory & Moral Practice
      issn: 13862820
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2015
      vid: 18
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        102077934
        10.1007/s10677-014-9524-x
      ppf: 385
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 276KB
      tig:
        atl: 'Honor Among (the Beneficiaries of) Thieves'.
      aug:
        au: Meketa, Irina
        affil: Philosophy Department and Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology Program, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive St. Louis 63130-4899 USA
      su:
        Fairness
        Cooperation
        Collective behavior
        Duty
        Social ethics
      sug:
        subj:
          Fairness
          Cooperation
          Collective behavior
          Duty
          Social ethics
      keyword:
        Cooperative scheme
        Externalities
        Fair play
        Free-riding
        Obligation
      ab: Traditional accounts of the fair play principle suggest that, under appropriate conditions, those who benefit from the cooperative labor of others acquire an obligation of repayment. However, these accounts have had little to say about the nature of such obligations within morally or legally problematic cooperative schemes, taking the matter to be either straightforward or unimportant. It is neither. The question of what sorts of fair play obligations obtain for those who benefit from illicit cooperative activity is a matter of great complexity and consequence with implications for, inter alia, global economic justice. In this essay, I explore the nature of this obligation within illicit cooperative schemes, specifically those with so-called negative externalities, or deleterious effects on non-members of the scheme. I conclude that the willing beneficiaries of such schemes acquire a fair-play obligation to recognize and respond to their culpability. This reconceptualization of the fair play principle opens up new avenues for exploring the obligations of those who benefit from acts of collective wrongdoing.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Ethical Theory & Moral Practice is a copyright of Springer, 2015. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Ethical Theory & Moral Practice
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2015
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N