Nicolas Baudeau, an anti-physiocrat? Éphémérides du citoyen prior to “conversion” (1765–1766).
Éphémérides du citoyenis often considered to be an anti-physiocratic periodical, up until Baudeau's adherence to Quesnay's theories in 1766. An analysis of the journal's main economic themes between 1765 and 1766 however shows that this interpretation is inaccurate. It is true that the theme of rura...
| Publicado en: | European Journal of the History of Economic Thought Vol. 22; no. 3; pp. 534 - 564 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jun2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=102270614&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 102270614 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 09672567 5B6 jtl: European Journal of the History of Economic Thought issn: 09672567 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2015 vid: 22 iid: 3 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 102270614 10.1080/09672567.2014.997833 ppf: 534 ppct: 30 formats: tig: atl: Nicolas Baudeau, an anti-physiocrat? Éphémérides du citoyen prior to “conversion” (1765–1766). aug: au: Clément, Alain su: Baudeau, Nicolas Physiocrats Economic periodicals Du Pont de Nemours, Pierre Samuel, 1739-1817 History of economics Eighteenth century sug: subj: Baudeau, Nicolas Physiocrats Economic periodicals Du Pont de Nemours, Pierre Samuel, 1739-1817 History of economics Eighteenth century keyword: Agriculture colonies economic decline luxury needs ab: Éphémérides du citoyenis often considered to be an anti-physiocratic periodical, up until Baudeau's adherence to Quesnay's theories in 1766. An analysis of the journal's main economic themes between 1765 and 1766 however shows that this interpretation is inaccurate. It is true that the theme of rurality, the issue of the colonies and Baudeau's needs analyses indicate an original line of thinking, in which the public powers played the role of primary investor via a “land clearing company” or a “threefold royal messengers service”. However, these contain no radical opposition to the liberal ideas developed by Quesnay. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2015 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|