Observational drawing biases are predicted by biases in perception: Empirical support of the misperception hypothesis of drawing accuracy with respect to two angle illusions.

We tested the misperception hypothesis of drawing errors, which states that drawing accuracy is strongly influenced by the perceptual encoding of a to-be-drawn stimulus. We used a highly controlled experimental paradigm in which nonartist participants made perceptual judgements and drawings of angle...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Vol. 68; no. 5; pp. 1007 - 1026
Main Authors: Ostrofsky, Justin, Kozbelt, Aaron, Cohen, Dale J.
Format: Article
Published: Sage Publications Inc. May2015
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=102360652&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 102360652
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        17470218
        1US5
      jtl: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
      issn: 17470218
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2015
      vid: 68
      iid: 5
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        102360652
        10.1080/17470218.2014.973889
      ppf: 1007
      ppct: 19
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Observational drawing biases are predicted by biases in perception: Empirical support of the misperception hypothesis of drawing accuracy with respect to two angle illusions.
      aug:
        au:
          Ostrofsky, Justin
          Kozbelt, Aaron
          Cohen, Dale J.
        affil:
          Department of Psychology, The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, Galloway, NJ, USA
          Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA
          Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina in Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA
      su:
        Sensory perception
        Empirical research
        Psychological research
        Statistical hypothesis testing
        Psychology of drawing
      sug:
        subj:
          Sensory perception
          Empirical research
          Psychological research
          Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
          Statistical hypothesis testing
          Psychology of drawing
      keyword:
        Angle illusion
        Drawing accuracy
        Misperception hypothesis
        Angle illusion
        Drawing accuracy
        Misperception hypothesis
      ab: We tested the misperception hypothesis of drawing errors, which states that drawing accuracy is strongly influenced by the perceptual encoding of a to-be-drawn stimulus. We used a highly controlled experimental paradigm in which nonartist participants made perceptual judgements and drawings of angles under identical stimulus exposure conditions. Experiment 1 examined the isosceles/scalene triangle angle illusion; congruent patterns of bias in the perception and drawing tasks were found for 40 and 60° angles, but not for 20 or 80° angles, providing mixed support for the misperception hypothesis. Experiment 2 examined shape constancy effects with respect to reproductions of single acute or obtuse angles; congruent patterns of bias in the perception and drawing tasks were found across a range of angles from 29 to 151°, providing strong support for the misperception hypothesis. In both experiments, perceptual and drawing biases were positively correlated. These results are largely consistent with the misperception hypothesis, suggesting that inaccurate perceptual encoding of angles is an important reason that nonartists err in drawing angles from observation.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N