Working memory capacity accounts for the ability to switch between object-based and location-based allocation of visual attention.

Bleckley, Durso, Crutchfield, Engle, and Khanna ( Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 884-889, ) found that visual attention allocation differed between groups high or low in working memory capacity (WMC). High-span, but not low-span, subjects showed an invalid-cue cost during a letter localization t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Memory & Cognition Vol. 43; no. 3; pp. 379 - 389
Autores principales: Bleckley, M., Foster, Jeffrey, Engle, Randall
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Apr2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=102426891&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 102426891
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0090502X
        MEG
      jtl: Memory & Cognition
      issn: 0090502X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2015
      vid: 43
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        102426891
        10.3758/s13421-014-0485-z
      ppf: 379
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 760KB
      tig:
        atl: Working memory capacity accounts for the ability to switch between object-based and location-based allocation of visual attention.
      aug:
        au:
          Bleckley, M.
          Foster, Jeffrey
          Engle, Randall
        affil:
          Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, Federal Aviation Administration, Oklahoma City USA
          School of Social Sciences and Psychology, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797 Penrith 2751 Australia
          School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 654 Cherry Street Atlanta 30332 USA
      su:
        Analysis of variance
        Attention
        Cognition
        Task performance
        Factor analysis
        Probability theory
        Short-term memory
        Statistics
        T-test (Statistics)
        Data analysis
        Descriptive statistics
      sug:
        subj:
          Analysis of variance
          Attention
          Cognition
          Task performance
          Factor analysis
          Probability theory
          Short-term memory
          Statistics
          T-test (Statistics)
          Data analysis
          Descriptive statistics
      keyword:
        Working memory
        Working memory
      ab: Bleckley, Durso, Crutchfield, Engle, and Khanna ( Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 884-889, ) found that visual attention allocation differed between groups high or low in working memory capacity (WMC). High-span, but not low-span, subjects showed an invalid-cue cost during a letter localization task in which the letter appeared closer to fixation than the cue, but not when the letter appeared farther from fixation than the cue. This suggests that low-spans allocated attention as a spotlight, whereas high-spans allocated their attention to objects. In this study, we tested whether utilizing object-based visual attention is a resource-limited process that is difficult for low-span individuals. In the first experiment, we tested the uses of object versus location-based attention with high and low-span subjects, with half of the subjects completing a demanding secondary load task. Under load, high-spans were no longer able to use object-based visual attention. A second experiment supported the hypothesis that these differences in allocation were due to high-spans using object-based allocation, whereas low-spans used location-based allocation.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N