Can we rank scholarly book publishers? A bibliometric experiment with the field of history.

This is a publisher ranking study based on a citation data grant from Elsevier, specifically, book titles cited in Scopus history journals (2007-2011) and matching metadata from WorldCat® (i.e., OCLC numbers, ISBN codes, publisher records, and library holding counts). Using both resources, we have c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology Vol. 66; no. 7; pp. 1333 - 1348
Autores principales: Zuccala, Alesia, Guns, Raf, Cornacchia, Roberto, Bod, Rens
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jul2015
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103107670&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 103107670
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        23301635
        H6JN
      jtl: Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology
      issn: 23301635
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2015
      vid: 66
      iid: 7
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        103107670
        103107670
        103107670
        10.1002/asi.23267
        103107670
      ppf: 1333
      ppct: 15
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Can we rank scholarly book publishers? A bibliometric experiment with the field of history.
      aug:
        au:
          Zuccala, Alesia
          Guns, Raf
          Cornacchia, Roberto
          Bod, Rens
        affil: Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94242, 1090 GE, Amsterdam The Netherlands
      sug:
        subj:
          Scholarship Trends
          Books
          Bibliometrics
          History
          Human
          Journal Impact Factor
          Reference Databases
          Cataloging Databases
          Serial Publications
      ab: This is a publisher ranking study based on a citation data grant from Elsevier, specifically, book titles cited in Scopus history journals (2007-2011) and matching metadata from WorldCat® (i.e., OCLC numbers, ISBN codes, publisher records, and library holding counts). Using both resources, we have created a unique relational database designed to compare citation counts to books with international library holdings or libcitations for scholarly book publishers. First, we construct a ranking of the top 500 publishers and explore descriptive statistics at the level of publisher type (university, commercial, other) and country of origin. We then identify the top 50 university presses and commercial houses based on total citations and mean citations per book ( CPB). In a third analysis, we present a map of directed citation links between journals and book publishers. American and British presses/publishing houses tend to dominate the work of library collection managers and citing scholars; however, a number of specialist publishers from Europe are included. Distinct clusters from the directed citation map indicate a certain degree of regionalism and subject specialization, where some journals produced in languages other than English tend to cite books published by the same parent press. Bibliometric rankings convey only a small part of how the actual structure of the publishing field has evolved; hence, challenges lie ahead for developers of new citation indices for books and bibliometricians interested in measuring book and publisher impacts.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N