No Physical Particles for a Dispositional Monist?

A dispositional monist believes that all properties are essentially causal. Recently, an overdetermination argument has been proposed by Trenton Merricks to support nihilism about ordinary objects. I argue that this argument can be extended to target both nihilism about ordinary objects and nihilism...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Papers Vol. 44; no. 2; pp. 207 - 233
Autor principal: Bihan, Baptiste Le
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jul2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=103244462&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 103244462
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        05568641
        273E
      jtl: Philosophical Papers
      issn: 05568641
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2015
      vid: 44
      iid: 2
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        103244462
        10.1080/05568641.2015.1056960
      ppf: 207
      ppct: 26
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 171KB
      tig:
        atl: No Physical Particles for a Dispositional Monist?
      aug:
        au: Bihan, Baptiste Le
        affil: Université de Rennes 1baptiste.le.bihan@hotmail.fr
      su:
        Monism
        Identity (Philosophical concept)
        Philosophy
        Merricks, Trenton
        Electrons
        Quarks
      sug:
        subj:
          Monism
          Identity (Philosophical concept)
          Philosophy
          Merricks, Trenton
          Electrons
          Quarks
      ab: A dispositional monist believes that all properties are essentially causal. Recently, an overdetermination argument has been proposed by Trenton Merricks to support nihilism about ordinary objects. I argue that this argument can be extended to target both nihilism about ordinary objects and nihilism about physical particles when dispositional monism is assumed. It implies that a philosopher who both endorses dispositional monism and takes seriously the overdetermination argument should not believe in the existence of physical particles. I end up by discussing possible objections. I suggest, then, that if we live in a world that is inhabited by causal properties but not by chairs and tables, then we also live in a world without electrons and quarks, a world of dispositional properties, that is, a world of causal fields.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophical Papers is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophical Papers
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2015
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N