Biosecurity and Open-Source Biology: The Promise and Peril of Distributed Synthetic Biological Technologies.
In this article, we raise ethical concerns about the potential misuse of open-source biology (OSB): biological research and development that progresses through an organisational model of radical openness, deskilling, and innovation. We compare this organisational structure to that of the open-source...
| Publicado en: | Science & Engineering Ethics Vol. 21; no. 4; pp. 1065 - 1084 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Aug2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=103737040&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 103737040 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13533452 GNI jtl: Science & Engineering Ethics issn: 13533452 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Aug2015 vid: 21 iid: 4 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 103737040 10.1007/s11948-014-9591-3 ppf: 1065 ppct: 19 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 436KB tig: atl: Biosecurity and Open-Source Biology: The Promise and Peril of Distributed Synthetic Biological Technologies. aug: au: Evans, Nicholas Selgelid, Michael affil: Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Suite 320, 3401 Market Street Philadelphia 19104 USA Centre for Human Bioethics, Monash University, Melbourne 3800 Australia su: Biosecurity Biological research Biotechnology ethics Open source software Bioterrorism Deskilling (Labor) sug: subj: Biosecurity Biological research Biotechnology ethics Open source software Bioterrorism Deskilling (Labor) keyword: Biocrime Biotechnology Deskilling Dual-use Open source Openness ab: In this article, we raise ethical concerns about the potential misuse of open-source biology (OSB): biological research and development that progresses through an organisational model of radical openness, deskilling, and innovation. We compare this organisational structure to that of the open-source software model, and detail salient ethical implications of this model. We demonstrate that OSB, in virtue of its commitment to openness, may be resistant to governance attempts. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Science & Engineering Ethics is a copyright of Springer, 2015. All Rights Reserved. item: Science & Engineering Ethics holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2015 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|