Bibliometric Analyses of Physical and Occupational Therapy Faculty across Canada Indicate Productivity and Impact of Rehabilitation Research.

Purpose: This study examines physical and occupational therapy faculty across Canada, using bibliometrics and federal funding as indicators of academic impact, and considers the validity of various bibliometric indices. Methods: Faculty members were identified and their rank, professional designatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Physiotherapy Canada Vol. 67; no. 1; pp. 76 - 85
Autores principales: MacDermid, Joy C., Fung, Eunice H., Law, Mary
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: University of Toronto Press 2015
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103750208&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 103750208
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03000508
        R42
      jtl: Physiotherapy Canada
      issn: 03000508
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2015
      vid: 67
      iid: 1
      pid: 678
      pub: University of Toronto Press
      place: North York, Ontario
    artinfo:
      ui:
        103750208
        100663612
        100663612
        10.3138/ptc.2013-71BC
        NLM25931657
        103750208
      ppf: 76
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Bibliometric Analyses of Physical and Occupational Therapy Faculty across Canada Indicate Productivity and Impact of Rehabilitation Research.
      aug:
        au:
          MacDermid, Joy C.
          Fung, Eunice H.
          Law, Mary
        affil: School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton
      sug:
        subj:
          Faculty, Allied Health Evaluation
          Productivity Evaluation
          Research, Allied Health Trends
          Bibliometrics Evaluation
          Human
          Canada
          Descriptive Statistics
          Analysis of Variance
          Confidence Intervals
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          P-Value
          Male
          Female
          Male
          Female
      ab: Purpose: This study examines physical and occupational therapy faculty across Canada, using bibliometrics and federal funding as indicators of academic impact, and considers the validity of various bibliometric indices. Methods: Faculty members were identified and their rank, professional designation, and department obtained from faculty Web sites. Bibliometric indicators were determined using Publish or Perish software. An independent author (not a faculty member) inspected the data to remove any incorrectly attributed publications. The h-index, citation years, g-index, and total number of citations for each faculty member were retrieved. The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) funding database was used to determine the amount of research funding provided to each faculty member as a principal investigator (PI) and his or her total CIHR funding received. Mean faculty indicators by university, rank, gender, and profession were determined. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to detect differences by rank and gender, and measures of association (Pearson correlation coefficients and multiple regression) were used to identify factors that affected h-index and PI funding received. Results: A total of 347 physical and occupational therapy faculty were identified. The median h-index was 5 (inter-quartile range [IQR] 2-8) for assistant professors, 11 (IQR 7-15) for associate professors, and 18 (IQR 12-26) for full professors. ANOVA indicated no significant differences between male and female faculty in terms of h-index or funding received. Regression analysis indicated that 58% of h-index variance could be explained by gender (p=0.039), appointment within a department that provides a (rehabilitation science) PhD programme (p<0.001), rank (p<0.001), CIHR PI funding (p=0.001), or total CIHR funding (p<0.001). Significant predictors of the amount of CIHR funding received as a PI included h-index (p<0.001) and total number of citations (p=0.023), which together explained 27% of the variation in funding received. Conclusion: The h-index, although not without flaws, provides a useful metric that indicates that physical and occupational faculty in Canada are productive scientists having a measurable impact and that this impact increases with rank and greater funding.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N