Effects of experimental negative affect manipulations on ad libitum smoking: a meta-analysis.
Aims To quantify the effect of negative affect (NA), when manipulated experimentally, upon smoking as measured within laboratory paradigms. Quantitative meta-analyses tested the effects of NA versus neutral conditions on (1) latency to smoke and (2) number of puffs taken. Methods Twelve experimental...
| Publicado en: | Addiction Vol. 110; no. 5; pp. 751 - 761 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
May2015
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103788441&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 103788441 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 09652140 AIO jtl: Addiction issn: 09652140 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: May2015 vid: 110 iid: 5 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 103788441 102059520 10.1111/add.12866 NLM25641624 103788441 ppf: 751 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Effects of experimental negative affect manipulations on ad libitum smoking: a meta-analysis. aug: au: Heckman, Bryan W. Carpenter, Matthew J. Correa, John B. Wray, Jennifer M. Saladin, Michael E. Froeliger, Brett Drobes, David J. Brandon, Thomas H. affil: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina sug: subj: Affect Smoking Cues Human Meta Analysis In Vitro Studies Effect Size Psycinfo PubMed Medline Checklists Research Methodology Evaluation Confidence Intervals Motivation Craving Funding Source ab: Aims To quantify the effect of negative affect (NA), when manipulated experimentally, upon smoking as measured within laboratory paradigms. Quantitative meta-analyses tested the effects of NA versus neutral conditions on (1) latency to smoke and (2) number of puffs taken. Methods Twelve experimental studies tested the influence of NA induction, relative to a neutral control condition ( n = 1190; range = 24-235). Those providing relevant data contributed to separate random-effects meta-analyses to examine the effects of NA on two primary smoking measures: (1) latency to smoke (nine studies) and (2) number of puffs taken during ad libitum smoking (11 studies). Hedge's g was calculated for all studies through the use of post-NA cue responses relative to post-neutral cue responses. This effect size estimate is similar to Cohen's d, but corrects for small sample size bias. Results NA reliably decreased latency to smoke ( g = -0.14; CI = -0.23 to -0.04; P = 0.007) and increased number of puffs taken ( g = 0.14; CI = 0.02 to 0.25; P = 0.02). There was considerable variability across studies for both outcomes (I2 = 51 and 65% for latency and consumption, respectively). Potential publication bias was indicated for both outcomes, and adjusted effect sizes were smaller and no longer statistically significant. Conclusions In experimental laboratory studies of smokers, negative affect appears to reduce latency to smoking and increase number of puffs taken, but this could be due to publication bias. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: meta analysis research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|