Imposing Genetic Diversity.

The idea that a world in which everyone was born “perfect” would be a world in which something valuable was missing often comes up in debates about the ethics of technologies of prenatal testing and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). This thought plays an important role in the “disability crit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Bioethics Vol. 15; no. 6; pp. 2 - 11
Autor principal: Sparrow, Robert
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jun2015
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103806464&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 103806464
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15265161
        FKZ
      jtl: American Journal of Bioethics
      issn: 15265161
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2015
      vid: 15
      iid: 6
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        103806464
        2013024591
        10.1080/15265161.2015.1028658
        NLM26030484
        103806464
      ppf: 2
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Imposing Genetic Diversity.
      aug:
        au: Sparrow, Robert
        affil: Monash University
      sug:
        subj:
          Persons with Disabilities
          Genetic Screening Ethical Issues
          Genetic Engineering Ethical Issues
          Bioethics
          Prenatal Diagnosis
          Fetus
          Fetus, conception to birth
      ab: The idea that a world in which everyone was born “perfect” would be a world in which something valuable was missing often comes up in debates about the ethics of technologies of prenatal testing and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). This thought plays an important role in the “disability critique” of prenatal testing. However, the idea that human genetic variation is an important good with significant benefits for society at large is also embraced by a wide range of figures writing in the bioethics literature, including some who are notoriously hostile to the idea that we should not select against disability. By developing a number of thought experiments wherein we are to contemplate increasing genetic diversity from a lower baseline in order to secure this value, I argue that this powerful intuition is more problematic than is generally recognized, especially where the price of diversity is the well-being of particular individuals.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N