Comparison of IMRT and VMAT plans with different energy levels using Monte-Carlo algorithm for prostate cancer.
Purpose: To make dosimetric comparisons of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and 7-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with dynamic MLCs using the Monaco treatment planning system with Monte Carlo algorithm.Materials and Methods: Single-arc VMAT and 7-field IMRT treatment plans were...
| Publicado en: | Japanese Journal of Radiology Vol. 32; no. 4; pp. 224 - 233 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | research Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Apr2014
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103818534&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 103818534 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 18671071 AUCM jtl: Japanese Journal of Radiology issn: 18671071 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr2014 vid: 32 iid: 4 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 103818534 NLM24510241 2012549860 10.1007/s11604-014-0291-3 NLM24510241 103818534 ppf: 224 ppct: 9 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Comparison of IMRT and VMAT plans with different energy levels using Monte-Carlo algorithm for prostate cancer. aug: au: Onal, Cem Arslan, Gungor Parlak, Cem Sonmez, Serhat affil: Department of Radiation Oncology, Adana Research and Treatment Centre, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, 01120, Turkey, hcemonal@hotmail.com. sug: subj: Systems Analysis Prostatic Neoplasms Radiotherapy Radiotherapy, Computer-Assisted Methods Radiotherapy, Conformal Methods Algorithms Male Radiation Dosage Male ab: Purpose: To make dosimetric comparisons of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and 7-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with dynamic MLCs using the Monaco treatment planning system with Monte Carlo algorithm.Materials and Methods: Single-arc VMAT and 7-field IMRT treatment plans were compared for 12 intermediate risk prostate cancer patients treated with prostate and seminal vesicle radiotherapy. For all patients, the prescribed dose was 78 Gy delivered in 39 fractions. The dosimetric data of IMRT and VMAT plans with 6, 10 and 15 MV energies were compared. The comparison was made for target volume, organs at risk (OAR) doses, and for monitor units (MU).Results: The normal tissue surrounding the target were lower in VMAT plans compared to IMRT plans. VMAT plans achieved lower doses to all OARs for nearly all dosimetric endpoints. VMAT plans achieved 9.4, 9.0 and 7.0 % relative decrease in MUs required for RT delivery, for 6, 10 and 15 MV energy levels, respectively. The target volume and OAR dosimetric values did not differ significantly between 6, 10 and 15 MV photon energies.Conclusion: VMAT plans were found to be dosimetrically equivalent to IMRT plans for prostate cancer patients, with better rectum and bladder sparing and fewer MUs required. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|