Comparison between the M and XL probes for liver fibrosis assessment by transient elastography.

Objective: Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using Transient Elastography (TE) for liver fibrosis assessment is difficult to be performed in obese and overweight patients by standard M probe, thus the XL probe was developed. The aim of our paper was to assess the usefulness of the XL probe in daily...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical Ultrasonography Vol. 16; no. 2; pp. 119 - 123
Main Authors: Sirli, Roxana, Sporea, Ioan, Deleanu, Alexandra, Culcea, Laura, Szilaski, Milana, Popescu, Alina, Danila, Mirela, Şirli, Roxana, Dănilă, Mirela
Format: research Journal Article
Published: Romanian Society of Ultrasonography in Medicine & Biology Jun2014
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103821536&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 103821536
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        18444172
        AX1S
      jtl: Medical Ultrasonography
      issn: 18444172
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2014
      vid: 16
      iid: 2
      pid: 57537
      pub: Romanian Society of Ultrasonography in Medicine & Biology
    artinfo:
      ui:
        103821536
        103821536
        NLM24791843
        2012571700
        NLM24791843
        103821536
      ppf: 119
      ppct: 4
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Comparison between the M and XL probes for liver fibrosis assessment by transient elastography.
      aug:
        au:
          Sirli, Roxana
          Sporea, Ioan
          Deleanu, Alexandra
          Culcea, Laura
          Szilaski, Milana
          Popescu, Alina
          Danila, Mirela
          Şirli, Roxana
          Dănilă, Mirela
        affil: Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, "Victor Babes" University and Medicine Timisoara, Romania
      sug:
        subj:
          Ultrasonography Equipment and Supplies
          Liver Cirrhosis Ultrasonography
          Transducers
          Adult
          Aged
          Body Mass Index
          Equipment Design
          Female
          Hepatitis B, Chronic Ultrasonography
          Hepatitis C, Chronic Ultrasonography
          Human
          Liver Ultrasonography
          Male
          Middle Age
          Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Ultrasonography
          Obesity Ultrasonography
          Prospective Studies
          Reproducibility of Results
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Objective: Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using Transient Elastography (TE) for liver fibrosis assessment is difficult to be performed in obese and overweight patients by standard M probe, thus the XL probe was developed. The aim of our paper was to assess the usefulness of the XL probe in daily clinical practice.Material and Method: Our study included 216 patients (mean BMI 30.1+/-4.1 kg/m2) with chronic hepatopathies, in which paired measurements were made using the M (3.5MHz) and XL (2.5 MHz) probes in the same session. In each patient 10 valid LSM were acquired with each probe, a median was calculated, expressed in kiloPascals (kPa). Unreliable TE measurements were considered: fewer than 10 valid shots; with a success rate (SR) <60% and/or interquartile range interval (IQR) ≥30%.Results: In 127 patients reliable LSM could not be obtained by standard M probe, 10 of them normal weight, 25 of them overweight, and 92 obese. By XL probe reliable measurements were obtained in 80/127(63%) of these patients: 8/10 (80%) of the normal weights, 17/25 (68%) of the overweight and 55/92 (59.8%) of the obese. In 98 patients with reliable M probe measurements, XL probe LSMs were also performed. XL LS values strongly and significantly correlated with those obtained by M probe (Spearman r=0.789, p<0.0001), but were significantly lower [median 6.4 kPa (range 3.1 - 53.8) vs 7.7 kPa (range 3.7-69.1), Wilcoxon paired t test p<0.001)].Conclusion: By using the XL probe, reliable LSM by TE can be obtained in more than 60% of patients with unreliable measurements by M probe. LSM by XL probe are significantly correlated, but lower, than those obtained by M probe.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N