Exploring perceptions of web accessibility: a survey approach.

The equality of access – accessibility – is difficult to quantify, define, or agree upon. Our previous work analysed the responses of web accessibility specialists in regard to a number of pre-defined definitions of accessibility. While uncovering much, this analysis did not allow us to quantify the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behaviour & Information Technology Vol. 34; no. 2; pp. 119 - 135
Main Authors: Yesilada, Yeliz, Brajnik, Giorgio, Vigo, Markel, Harper, Simon
Format: research Journal Article
Published: Taylor & Francis Ltd Feb2015
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103872954&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 103872954
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0144929X
        B6Q
      jtl: Behaviour & Information Technology
      issn: 0144929X
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2015
      vid: 34
      iid: 2
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        103872954
        100355619
        10.1080/0144929X.2013.848238
        103872954
      ppf: 119
      ppct: 16
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Exploring perceptions of web accessibility: a survey approach.
      aug:
        au:
          Yesilada, Yeliz
          Brajnik, Giorgio
          Vigo, Markel
          Harper, Simon
        affil: Middle East Technical University Northern Cyprus Campus, Kalkanlı, Güzelyurt,Mersin 10, Turkey
      sug:
        subj:
          Website Development
          Access to Information
          Human
          Surveys
          Communication Aids for Persons with Disabilities
      ab: The equality of access – accessibility – is difficult to quantify, define, or agree upon. Our previous work analysed the responses of web accessibility specialists in regard to a number of pre-defined definitions of accessibility. While uncovering much, this analysis did not allow us to quantify the communities’ understanding of the relationship accessibility has with other domains and assess how the community scopes accessibility. In this case, we asked over 300 people, with an interest in accessibility, to answer 33 questions surrounding the relationship between accessibility, user experience (UX), and usability; inclusion and exclusion; and evaluation, in an attempt to harmonise our understanding of web accessibility. We found that respondents think that accessibility and usability are highly related and also think that accessibility is applicable to everyone and not just people with disabilities. Respondents strongly agree that accessibility must be grounded on user-centred practices and that accessibility evaluation is more than just inspecting source code; however, they are divided as to whether training in ‘Web Content Accessibility Guidelines’ is necessary or not to assess accessibility. These perceptions are important for usability and UX professionals, developers of automated evaluation tools, and those practitioners running website evaluations.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N