Digitized Whole Slides for Breast Pathology Interpretation: Current Practices and Perceptions.

Digital whole slide imaging (WSI) is an emerging technology for pathology interpretation; however, little is known about pathologists' practice patterns or perceptions regarding WSI. A national sample ( N = 252) of pathologists from New Hampshire, Vermont, Washington, Oregon, Arizona, Alaska, Maine,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Digital Imaging Vol. 27; no. 5; pp. 642 - 649
Autores principales: Onega, Tracy, Weaver, Donald, Geller, Berta, Oster, Natalia, Tosteson, Anna, Carney, Patricia, Nelson, Heidi, Allison, Kimberly, O'Malley, Frances, Schnitt, Stuart, Elmore, Joann
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Oct2014
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103894387&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 103894387
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        08971889
        DOQ
      jtl: Journal of Digital Imaging
      issn: 08971889
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2014
      vid: 27
      iid: 5
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        103894387
        98419618
        10.1007/s10278-014-9683-2
        NLM24682769
        PMC4171431
        103894387
      ppf: 642
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Digitized Whole Slides for Breast Pathology Interpretation: Current Practices and Perceptions.
      aug:
        au:
          Onega, Tracy
          Weaver, Donald
          Geller, Berta
          Oster, Natalia
          Tosteson, Anna
          Carney, Patricia
          Nelson, Heidi
          Allison, Kimberly
          O'Malley, Frances
          Schnitt, Stuart
          Elmore, Joann
        affil: Department of Community & Family Medicine, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, and The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, HB 7927 Rubin 8-DHMC, One Medical Center Dr. Lebanon 03756 USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Microscopy, Virtual
          Practice Patterns
          Pathologists
          Breast Pathology
          Attitude Measures
          Physician Attitudes
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Surveys
          Questionnaires
          Summated Rating Scaling
          Descriptive Statistics
          Data Analysis Software
          P-Value
          Chi Square Test
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Male
          Female
          Human
          Funding Source
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Digital whole slide imaging (WSI) is an emerging technology for pathology interpretation; however, little is known about pathologists' practice patterns or perceptions regarding WSI. A national sample ( N = 252) of pathologists from New Hampshire, Vermont, Washington, Oregon, Arizona, Alaska, Maine, and Minnesota were surveyed in this cross-sectional study (2011-2013). The survey included questions on pathologists' experience, WSI practice patterns, and perceptions using a six-point Likert scale. Agreement was summarized with descriptive statistics to characterize pathologists' use and perceptions of WSI. The majority of participating pathologists were males (63 %) between 40 and 59 years of age (70 %) and not affiliated with an academic medical center (72 %). Experience with WSI was reported by 49 %. Types of use reported included CME/board exams/teaching (28 %), tumor board/clinical conference (22 %), archival purposes (6 %), consultative diagnosis (4 %), research (4 %), and other uses (12 %). Most respondents (79 %) agreed that accurate diagnoses can be made with this technology, and that WSI is useful for obtaining a second opinion (88 %). However, 78 % of pathologists agreed that digital slides are too slow for routine clinical interpretation. Fifty-nine percent agreed that the benefits of WSI outweigh concerns. The respondents were equally split as to whether they would like to adopt WSI (51 %) or not (49 %). About half of pathologists reported experience with the WSI technology, largely for CME, licensure/board exams, and teaching. Positive perceptions regarding WSI slightly outweigh negative perceptions. Understanding practice patterns with WSI as dissemination advances may facilitate concordance of perceptions with adoption of the technology.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N