Exploring the clinical approach to the bimodal fitting of hearing aids and cochlear implants: results of an international survey.

Conclusions: The results show that the fitting of a contralateral hearing aid (HA) in the non-implanted ear of cochlear implant (CI) recipients is now well established as standard clinical practice. However, there is a lack of experience in HA fitting within the CI centres and the use of published b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Acta Oto-Laryngologica Vol. 134; no. 11; pp. 1151 - 1158
Autores principales: Scherf, Fanny W. A. C., Arnold, Laure P.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Nov2014
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103903665&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 103903665
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00016489
        B6D
      jtl: Acta Oto-Laryngologica
      issn: 00016489
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2014
      vid: 134
      iid: 11
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        103903665
        98882133
        10.3109/00016489.2014.914244
        NLM25315914
        103903665
      ppf: 1151
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Exploring the clinical approach to the bimodal fitting of hearing aids and cochlear implants: results of an international survey.
      aug:
        au:
          Scherf, Fanny W. A. C.
          Arnold, Laure P.
        affil: Advanced Bionics Clinical Research Department International, Stäfa, Switzerland
      sug:
        subj:
          Hearing Aid Fitting Methods
          Cochlear Implant
          Professional Practice
          Human
          Questionnaires
          Multicenter Studies
          Health Personnel
          Young Adult
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
      ab: Conclusions: The results show that the fitting of a contralateral hearing aid (HA) in the non-implanted ear of cochlear implant (CI) recipients is now well established as standard clinical practice. However, there is a lack of experience in HA fitting within the CI centres and the use of published bimodal fitting procedures is poor. The HA is often not refitted after CI switch-on and this may contribute to rejection. Including a bimodal fitting prescription and process in the CI fitting software would make applying a balancing procedure easier and may increase its implementation in routine clinical practice. Objective: This survey was designed to investigate and understand the current approach to bimodal fitting of HAs and CIs across different countries and the recommendations made to recipients. Methods: Clinicians working with HAs and/or CIs were invited to participate in an international multicentre clinical survey, designed to obtain information on the various approaches towards bimodal hearing and CI and HA device fitting. Forty-one questions were presented to clinicians in experienced CI centres across a range of countries and answers were collected via an online survey. Results: In all, 65 responses were obtained from 12 different countries. All clinicians said they would advise a CI user to wear a contralateral HA if indicated. However, a significant number (45%) had either never fitted HAs before or had less than 1 year of experience. In general, there were no specific criteria for selecting candidates to fit with an HA. A strategy to balance the HA with the CI was not used as a standard practice for any of the adults and was used in only 12% of the children. Only half the respondents were aware of the bimodal literature. The majority of professionals (18/30) did not refit the HA after CI switch-on. However, if users complained of sound quality or loudness issues or had poor test results, a follow-up session was provided. The main benefit reported by recipients was improvement in overall sound quality.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N