Gait assessment in clinical context: a systematic literature review.
Introduction: In clinical practice there is a need for instruments that are easy to use and affordable, but also, valid, reliable and from which clinical inferences are easy to make. This review aims to identify instruments for gait assessment that could easily be used in clinical practice and to ch...
| Publicado en: | ConScientiae Saúde Vol. 13; no. 3; pp. 451 - 471 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Nove de Julho University
2014
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103905738&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 103905738 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 16771028 B0TO jtl: ConScientiae Saúde issn: 16771028 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2014 vid: 13 iid: 3 pid: 59221 pub: Nove de Julho University artinfo: ui: 103905738 103905738 2012766413 10.5585/ConsSaude.v13n3.4824 103905738 ppf: 451 ppct: 20 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Gait assessment in clinical context: a systematic literature review. aug: au: da Fonseca Cardoso, Sérgio Correia Silva, Anabela G. affil: Aluno do quarto ano de Licenciatura em Fisioterapia, Escola Superior de Saúde, Universidade de Aveiro, UA, Campus Universitário de Santiago Aveiro, Portugal sug: subj: Gait Analysis Human Systematic Review Reproducibility of Results PubMed Intraclass Correlation Coefficient Coefficient alpha ab: Introduction: In clinical practice there is a need for instruments that are easy to use and affordable, but also, valid, reliable and from which clinical inferences are easy to make. This review aims to identify instruments for gait assessment that could easily be used in clinical practice and to characterize them in terms of psychometric properties and aspects of clinical interpretation. Methods : The search was conducted in five databases using combinations of different key words. A list of identified instruments that met the inclusion criteria was created and a second search conducted combining the name of the instrument with the words: “validity”, “reliability”, “responsiveness” and “change score”. Results : Fifteen instruments were included in this systematic review. Most of them showed adequate to excellent validity and reliability. Data regarding most aspects of clinical interpretation were missing. Conclusion : There is a need to study the identified instruments in terms of aspects of clinical interpretation and that validate them to Portuguese. Introdução: Em ambiente clínico é necessário recorrer a instrumentos de avaliação de rápida utilização e baixo custo, válidos, fiáveis e fáceis de interpretar. Nesta revisão, pretende-se identificar e caracterizar, do ponto de vista psicométrico e de interpretação clínica, instrumentos de avaliação da marcha utilizáveis na prática clínica. Métodos: A pesquisa foi realizada em cinco bases de dados utilizando combinações de várias palavras-chave. Elaborou-se uma lista dos instrumentos que cumpriam os critérios de inclusão, e fez-se nova pesquisa nas mesmas bases combinando o nome do instrumento com “validity”, “reliability”, “responsiveness” e “change score”. Resultados : Incluíram-se 15 instrumentos/ testes de avaliação. A maioria destes apresenta adequada a excelente confiabili - dade e validade. A interpretação clínica dos dados recolhidos com os instrumentos analisados tem sido pouco estudada. Conclusão: São necessários mais estudos que avaliem os aspectos de interpretação clínica dos instrumentos/testes de avaliação da marcha e que validem estas ferramentas para a língua portuguesa. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: Portuguese refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|