Field Evaluation of a Modified Intervention for Overhead Drilling.

Drilling holes into concrete or metal ceilings is one of the most physically demanding tasks performed in construction. The work is done overhead with rotary impact hammer drills that weigh up to 40 N. The task is associated with pain and musculoskeletal disorders at the wrist, forearm, shoulder, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Occupational & Environmental Hygiene Vol. 7; no. 4; pp. 194 - 203
Autores principales: Rempel, David, Star, Demetra, Barr, Alan, Blanco, Marco Mendoza, Janowitz, Ira
Formato: CEU research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Apr2010
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103905802&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 103905802
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15459624
        V1L
      jtl: Journal of Occupational & Environmental Hygiene
      issn: 15459624
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2010
      vid: 7
      iid: 4
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        103905802
        47603021
        10.1080/15459620903558491
        103905802
      ppf: 194
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Field Evaluation of a Modified Intervention for Overhead Drilling.
      aug:
        au:
          Rempel, David
          Star, Demetra
          Barr, Alan
          Blanco, Marco Mendoza
          Janowitz, Ira
        affil: Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California.; Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
      sug:
        subj:
          Occupational Safety
          Equipment Design
          Construction Industry United States
          United States
          Human
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Focus Groups
          Adult
          Demography
          Questionnaires
          Productivity
          Flexion
          Abduction
          Analysis of Variance
          Repeated Measures
          Data Analysis Software
          Fatigue
          Education, Continuing (Credit)
          Adult: 19-44 years
      ab: Drilling holes into concrete or metal ceilings is one of the most physically demanding tasks performed in construction. The work is done overhead with rotary impact hammer drills that weigh up to 40 N. The task is associated with pain and musculoskeletal disorders at the wrist, forearm, shoulder, and back. The mechanism of injury is thought to be the high forces and non-neutral shoulder and wrist postures applied during drilling. Previously, we described a field study of a foot lever and inverted drill press intervention devices that received poor usability ratings compared with the usual method for overhead drilling based on problems with mobility and productivity. Using a participatory intervention model, feedback from construction workers (N = 13) was used to develop a new intervention design that incorporated a wheeled tripod base and a unique method of aligning the drilling column to vertical. A different group of construction workers (N = 23) evaluated usability and fatigue of the new device during their regular overhead drilling in comparison with the usual method. Four of 12 usability ratings were significantly better with the intervention device compared with the usual method. Subjective shoulder fatigue was less with the new intervention (1.1 vs. 3.3; scale 0 to 5; p < 0.001). This difference was supported by objective outcome measures; the mean hand forces during drilling were 26 N with the intervention compared with 245 N with the usual method. The percentage of time with the shoulder flexed or abducted to more than 60 degrees was less with the intervention compared with the usual method (21 vs. 40%; p = 0.007). There was significantly less head extension with the intervention compared with the usual method. There were no significant differences in overall productivity between the two methods. This study demonstrates that a new intervention device for overhead drilling has improved usability and subjective fatigue ratings compared with the usual method. These improvements are most likely due to the reduced hand forces, reduced shoulder abduction and flexion, and reduced drilling time.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        CEU
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N