Estimating the Health Effects of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Strategies: Addressing Parametric, Model, and Valuation Challenges.

Background: Policy decisions regarding climate change mitigation are increasingly incorporating the beneficial and adverse health impacts of greenhouse gas emission reduction strategies. Studies of such co-benefits and co-harms involve modeling approaches requiring a range of analytic decisions that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Environmental Health Perspectives Vol. 122; no. 5; pp. 447 - 456
Autores principales: Remais, Justin V., Hess, Jeremy J., Ebi, Kristie L., Markandya, Anil, Balbus, John M., Wilkinson, Paul, Haines, Andy, Chalabi, Zaid
Formato: review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences May2014
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103941163&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 103941163
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00916765
        3B5
      jtl: Environmental Health Perspectives
      issn: 00916765
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2014
      vid: 122
      iid: 5
      pid: 56539
      pub: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
      place: Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
    artinfo:
      ui:
        103941163
        95889799
        10.1289/ehp.1306744
        NLM24583270
        103941163
      ppf: 447
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Estimating the Health Effects of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Strategies: Addressing Parametric, Model, and Valuation Challenges.
      aug:
        au:
          Remais, Justin V.
          Hess, Jeremy J.
          Ebi, Kristie L.
          Markandya, Anil
          Balbus, John M.
          Wilkinson, Paul
          Haines, Andy
          Chalabi, Zaid
        affil: Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Greenhouse Effect Prevention and Control
          Greenhouse Effect Psychosocial Factors
          Models, Theoretical
          Health Impact Assessment
          Funding Source
          Public Policy
          Environmental Exposure Risk Factors
          Environmental Health Evaluation
          Aerosols
          Air Pollutants, Environmental
      ab: Background: Policy decisions regarding climate change mitigation are increasingly incorporating the beneficial and adverse health impacts of greenhouse gas emission reduction strategies. Studies of such co-benefits and co-harms involve modeling approaches requiring a range of analytic decisions that affect the model output. Objective: Our objective was to assess analytic decisions regarding model framework, structure, choice of parameters, and handling of uncertainty when modeling health co-benefits, and to make recommendations for improvements that could increase policy uptake. Methods: We describe the assumptions and analytic decisions underlying models of mitigation co-benefits, examining their effects on modeling outputs, and consider tools for quantifying uncertainty. Discussion: There is considerable variation in approaches to valuation metrics, discounting methods, uncertainty characterization and propagation, and assessment of low-probability/high-impact events. There is also variable inclusion of adverse impacts of mitigation policies, and limited extension of modeling domains to include implementation considerations. Going forward, co-benefits modeling efforts should be carried out in collaboration with policy makers; these efforts should include the full range of positive and negative impacts and critical uncertainties, as well as a range of discount rates, and should explicitly characterize uncertainty. We make recommendations to improve the rigor and consistency of modeling of health co-benefits. Conclusion: Modeling health co-benefits requires systematic consideration of the suitability of model assumptions, of what should be included and excluded from the model framework, and how uncertainty should be treated. Increased attention to these and other analytic decisions has the potential to increase the policy relevance and application of co-benefits modeling studies, potentially helping policy makers to maximize mitigation potential while simultaneously improving health.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N