Postprocedure Mapping of Cardiac Resynchronization Lead Position Using Standard Fluoroscopy Systems: Implications for the Nonresponder with Scar.

Background The relationship between cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), left ventricular (LV) lead position, scar, and regional mechanical function influences CRT response. Objective To determine LV lead position relative to LV structural characteristics in standard clinical practice, we develo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology Vol. 37; no. 6; pp. 757 - 768
Autores principales: Parker, Katherine M., Bunting, Ethan, Malhotra, Rohit, Clarke, Samantha A., Mason, Pamela, Darby, Andrew E., Kramer, Christopher M., Salerno, Michael, Holmes, Jeffrey W., Bilchick, Kenneth C.
Formato: diagnostic images equations & formulas pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jun2014
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103958587&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 103958587
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01478389
        4F8
      jtl: Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology
      issn: 01478389
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2014
      vid: 37
      iid: 6
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        103958587
        96408866
        10.1111/pace.12344
        NLM24472061
        103958587
      ppf: 757
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Postprocedure Mapping of Cardiac Resynchronization Lead Position Using Standard Fluoroscopy Systems: Implications for the Nonresponder with Scar.
      aug:
        au:
          Parker, Katherine M.
          Bunting, Ethan
          Malhotra, Rohit
          Clarke, Samantha A.
          Mason, Pamela
          Darby, Andrew E.
          Kramer, Christopher M.
          Salerno, Michael
          Holmes, Jeffrey W.
          Bilchick, Kenneth C.
        affil: Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia
      sug:
        subj:
          Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
          Electrodes, Implanted Evaluation
          Fluoroscopy Methods
          Human
          Animal Studies
          Dogs
          Histological Techniques
          Tomography, X-Ray Computed
          Phlebography
          Descriptive Statistics
          Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods
          Female
          Calibration Methods
          Interrater Reliability
          Data Analysis Software
          Fisher's Exact Test
          Male
          Aged
          Middle Age
          Funding Source
          Aged: 65+ years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Background The relationship between cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), left ventricular (LV) lead position, scar, and regional mechanical function influences CRT response. Objective To determine LV lead position relative to LV structural characteristics in standard clinical practice, we developed and validated a practical yet mathematically rigorous method to register procedural fluoroscopic LV lead position with pre-CRT cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Methods After one-time calibration of the standard fluoroscopic suite, we identified the projected CMR LV lead position using three reference landmarks on both CMR and fluoroscopy. This predicted lead position was validated in a canine model by histology and in eight 'validation group' patients based on postoperative computed tomography scans (n = 7) or CMR coronary sinus venography (n = 1). The methodology was applied in an additional eight patients with CRT nonresponse and infarction-related myocardial scar. Results The projected and actual lead positions were within 1.2 mm in the canine model. The median distance between projected and actual lead positions for the validation group (n = 8) and animal validation case was 11.3 mm (interquartile range 9.2-14.6 mm). In the application (nonresponder) group (n = 8), the lead mapped to the scar periphery in three patients, the core of the scar in one patient, and more than 3 cm from scar in four patients. Conclusions This methodology projects procedural fluoroscopic LV lead position onto pre-CRT CMR using standard fluoroscopic equipment and a one-time calibration, enabling assessment of LV lead position with sufficient accuracy to identify the lead position relative to regional function and infarction-related scar in CRT nonresponders.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        equations & formulas
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N