Evidence for the existing American Nurses Association-recognized standardized nursing terminologies: A systematic review.
Objective: To determine the state of the science for the five standardized nursing terminology sets in terms of level of evidence and study focus. Design: Systematic review. Data sources: Keyword search of PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases from 1960s to March 19, 2012 revealed 1257 publications....
| Publicado en: | International Journal of Nursing Studies Vol. 51; no. 8; pp. 1160 - 1171 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | pictorial research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2014
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103959650&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 103959650 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00207489 JHV jtl: International Journal of Nursing Studies issn: 00207489 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2014 vid: 51 iid: 8 pid: 82545 pub: Elsevier B.V. place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 103959650 96521334 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.004 NLM24412062 103959650 ppf: 1160 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Evidence for the existing American Nurses Association-recognized standardized nursing terminologies: A systematic review. aug: au: Tastan, Sevinc Linch, Graciele C.F. Keenan, Gail M. Stifter, Janet McKinney, Dawn Fahey, Linda Lopez, Karen Dunn Yao, Yingwei Wilkie, Diana J. affil: School of Nursing, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey sug: subj: Nursing Classification Research, Nursing Nursing Practice, Evidence-Based Nursing Science Human Funding Source Systematic Review PubMed CINAHL Database Embase Interrater Reliability Research Methodology NANDA International Iowa Nursing Interventions Classification Iowa Nursing Outcomes Classification Omaha System American Nurses Association International Classification for Nursing Practice Saba Clinical Care Classification System Data Analysis Software kappa Statistic ab: Objective: To determine the state of the science for the five standardized nursing terminology sets in terms of level of evidence and study focus. Design: Systematic review. Data sources: Keyword search of PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases from 1960s to March 19, 2012 revealed 1257 publications. Review methods: From abstract review we removed duplicate articles, those not in English or with no identifiable standardized nursing terminology, and those with a low-level of evidence. From full text review of the remaining 312 articles, eight trained raters used a coding system to record standardized nursing terminology names, publication year, country, and study focus. Inter-rater reliability confirmed the level of evidence. We analyzed coded results. Results: On average there were 4 studies per year between 1985 and 1995. The yearly number increased to 14 for the decade between 1996 and 2005, 21 between 2006 and 2010, and 25 in 2011. Investigators conducted the research in 27 countries. By evidence level for the 312 studies 72.4% were descriptive, 18.9% were observational, and 8.7% were intervention studies. Of the 312 reports, 72.1% focused on North American Nursing Diagnosis-International, Nursing Interventions Classification, Nursing Outcome Classifica- tion, or some combination of those three standardized nursing terminologies; 9.6% on Omaha System; 7.1% on International Classification for Nursing Practice; 1.6% on Clinical Care Classification/Home Health Care Classification; 1.6% on Perioperative Nursing Data Set; and 8.0% on two or more standardized nursing terminology sets. There were studies in all 10 foci categories including those focused on concept analysis/classification infrastructure (n = 43), the identification of the standardized nursing terminology concepts applicable to a health setting from registered nurses' documentation (n = 54), mapping one terminology to another (n = 58), implementation of standardized nursing terminologies into electronic health records (n = 12), and secondary use of electronic health record data (n = 19). pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: pictorial research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|