Systematic analysis of tobacco treatment interventions implemented in worksite settings.
Introduction: Smoking remains the leading cause of preventable death in the United States. The purpose of this investigation was to systematically analyze smoking cessation interventions conducted in worksite settings. Methods: Three researchers conducted a search of CINAHL, MEDLINE, ERIC and Psycho...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Substance Use Vol. 19; no. 4; pp. 283 - 295 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Aug2014
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103965898&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 103965898 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 14659891 ILV jtl: Journal of Substance Use issn: 14659891 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Aug2014 vid: 19 iid: 4 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 103965898 96700022 10.3109/14659891.2013.799240 103965898 ppf: 283 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Systematic analysis of tobacco treatment interventions implemented in worksite settings. aug: au: Knowlden, Adam P. Ickes, Melinda J. Sharma, Manoj affil: Health Promotion & Education Program, University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH USA sug: subj: Smoking Prevention and Control Smoking Cessation Evaluation Work Human Systematic Review Descriptive Statistics Nicotine Replacement Therapy Evaluation ab: Introduction: Smoking remains the leading cause of preventable death in the United States. The purpose of this investigation was to systematically analyze smoking cessation interventions conducted in worksite settings. Methods: Three researchers conducted a search of CINAHL, MEDLINE, ERIC and Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection databases, independently. Eligibility of articles was evaluated by the following criteria: (1) primary research; (2) tobacco/smoking treatment interventions; (3) implemented in worksite settings; (4) conducted in the United States and abroad; (5) used a quantitative design; (6) published between March 2009 and January 2013 (based on articles published after a similar review). Results: A total of 12 articles satisfied the inclusion criteria. Nine programs reported a positive effect on tobacco/smoking treatment. Seven of the interventions were theory-based, with six of these applying the transtheoretical stages of change model. Four of the programs included pharmacotherapy and six incorporated incentives. Conclusions: Worksite smoking treatment intervention design can be improved by incorporation of more robust designs with extended follow-up measures, explicit operationalization of theoretical frameworks, inclusion of ecological theory-based frameworks and integration of fidelity process evaluation. Pharmacotherapy in conjunction with behavior modification appears efficacious; however, the ability of financial incentives to motivate behavior change is still unconfirmed. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|