Computer-Adaptive Balance Testing Improves Discrimination Between Community-Dwelling Elderly Fallers and Nonfallers.

Abstract: Objectives: To build an item response theory–based computer adaptive test (CAT) for balance from 3 traditional, fixed-form balance measures: Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA), and dynamic gait index (DGI); and to examine whether the CAT's psychometri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Vol. 95; no. 7; pp. 1320 - 1321
Autores principales: Pardasaney, Poonam K., Ni, Pengsheng, Slavin, Mary D., Latham, Nancy K., Wagenaar, Robert C., Bean, Jonathan, Jette, Alan M.
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: W B Saunders Jul2014
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103966353&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 103966353
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00039993
        1XL
      jtl: Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
      issn: 00039993
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2014
      vid: 95
      iid: 7
      pid: 1351
      pub: W B Saunders
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        103966353
        96726018
        10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.013
        NLM24685388
        103966353
      ppf: 1320
      ppct: 1
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Computer-Adaptive Balance Testing Improves Discrimination Between Community-Dwelling Elderly Fallers and Nonfallers.
      aug:
        au:
          Pardasaney, Poonam K.
          Ni, Pengsheng
          Slavin, Mary D.
          Latham, Nancy K.
          Wagenaar, Robert C.
          Bean, Jonathan
          Jette, Alan M.
        affil: Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA; Health and Disability Research Institute, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA
      sug:
        subj:
          Accidental Falls
          Computerized Adaptive Testing Evaluation
          Balance, Postural Evaluation
          Instrument Construction
          Instrument Validation
          Geriatric Assessment
          Clinical Assessment Tools Evaluation
          Psychometrics
          Clinical Assessment Tools
          Scales
          Secondary Analysis
          Rasch Analysis
          Validation Studies
          Reliability
          P-Value
          Funding Source
          Human
      ab: Abstract: Objectives: To build an item response theory–based computer adaptive test (CAT) for balance from 3 traditional, fixed-form balance measures: Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA), and dynamic gait index (DGI); and to examine whether the CAT's psychometric performance exceeded that of individual measures. Design: Secondary analysis combining 2 existing datasets. Setting: Community based. Participants: Community-dwelling older adults (N=187) who were aged ≥65 years (mean age, 75.2±6.8y, 69% women). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: The BBS, POMA, and DGI items were compiled into an initial 38-item bank. The Rasch partial credit model was used for final item bank calibration. CAT simulations were conducted to identify the ideal CAT. CAT score accuracy, reliability, floor and ceiling effects, and validity were examined. Floor and ceiling effects and validity of the CAT and individual measures were compared. Results: A 23-item bank met model expectations. A 10-item CAT was selected, showing a very strong association with full item bank scores (r=.97) and good overall reliability (.78). Reliability was better in low- to midbalance ranges as a result of better item targeting to balance ability when compared with the highest balance ranges. No floor effect was noted. The CAT ceiling effect (11.2%) was significantly lower than the POMA (40.1%) and DGI (40.3%) ceiling effects (P<.001 per comparison). The CAT outperformed individual measures, being the only test to discriminate between fallers and nonfallers (P=.007), and being the strongest predictor of self-reported function. Conclusions: The balance CAT showed excellent accuracy, good overall reliability, and excellent validity compared with individual measures, being the only measure to discriminate between fallers and nonfallers. Prospective examination, particularly in low-functioning older adults and clinical populations with balance deficits, is recommended. Development of an improved CAT based on an expanded item bank containing higher difficulty items is also recommended.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N