Hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated dental implants display better bone formation in the peri-implant area than the same combination plus bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated implants, hydroxyapatite only coated implants, and uncoated implants.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare peri-implant bone formation among uncoated (UC), hydroxyapatite (HA), collagen plus HA (CH), and collagen, HA, plus bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) implant groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Implants in the UC group had acid-etched surfaces. The s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (02782391) Vol. 72; no. 1; pp. 53 - 61
Autores principales: Lee, Sang-Woon, Hahn, Byung-Dong, Kang, Tae Yeon, Lee, Myung-Jin, Choi, Je-Yong, Kim, Min-Keun, Kim, Seong-Gon
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: W B Saunders Jan2014
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103998197&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 103998197
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02782391
        1YP
      jtl: Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (02782391)
      issn: 02782391
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2014
      vid: 72
      iid: 1
      pid: 1351
      pub: W B Saunders
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        103998197
        103998197
        2012437311
        10.1016/j.joms.2013.08.031
        NLM24331565
        103998197
      ppf: 53
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated dental implants display better bone formation in the peri-implant area than the same combination plus bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated implants, hydroxyapatite only coated implants, and uncoated implants.
      aug:
        au:
          Lee, Sang-Woon
          Hahn, Byung-Dong
          Kang, Tae Yeon
          Lee, Myung-Jin
          Choi, Je-Yong
          Kim, Min-Keun
          Kim, Seong-Gon
        affil: Fellow, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Korea.
      sug:
        subj:
          Biocompatible Materials
          Bone Morphogenetic Proteins
          Collagen
          Dental Implants
          Minerals
          Osteogenesis Physiology
          Prosthesis Design
          Acid Etching, Dental Methods
          Aerosols
          Animal Studies
          Bone Regeneration Physiology
          Dental Materials
          Materials Testing
          Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
          Rabbits
          Spectrophotometry, Infrared
          Surface Properties
          Tibia Pathology
          Tibia Surgery
          Titanium
          X-Rays
      ab: PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare peri-implant bone formation among uncoated (UC), hydroxyapatite (HA), collagen plus HA (CH), and collagen, HA, plus bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) implant groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Implants in the UC group had acid-etched surfaces. The surface coating was applied using the aerosol deposition method. The coated surfaces were examined by scanning electron microscopy, x-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier-transformed infrared absorption analysis. Subsequently, 6 implants from each group (total, 24 implants) were installed in the tibias of rabbits. The animals were sacrificed at 6 weeks after implant installation. Peri-implant bone formation and bone-to-implant contact (BIC) were measured in histologic sections. Significant differences among groups were evaluated using analysis of variance. RESULTS: Based on the measured XRD patterns, there was a characteristic HA phase (International Centre for Diffraction Data [ICDD], 086-0740) coated on the titanium (ICDD, 089-3725). Subsequent coating processes for collagen and BMP-2 did not display additional diffraction peaks, but maintained the diffraction patterns of the HA-coated titanium. The presence of collagen was verified by infrared absorption analysis. When comparing these modifications with UC surfaces, only the CH coating displayed significantly greater peri-implant bone formation and BIC (P = .003 and P < .001, respectively). Adding BMP-2 to the implant surface did not produce any advantage compared with the CH coating. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the CH group displayed significantly greater new bone formation and BIC than the other groups. There was no significant difference among the other groups.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N