Comparative statistical properties of expected utility and area under the ROC curve for laboratory studies of observer performance in screening mammography.

Rationale and Objectives: Our objective is to determine whether expected utility (EU) and the area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUC) are consistent with one another as endpoints of observer performance studies in mammography. These two measures characterize receiver operator character...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Academic Radiology Vol. 21; no. 4; pp. 481 - 491
Autores principales: Abbey, Craig K, Gallas, Brandon D, Boone, John M, Niklason, Loren T, Hadjiiski, Lubomir M, Sahiner, Berkman, Samuelson, Frank W
Formato: case study research Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Apr2014
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104037596&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104037596
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10766332
        T4X
      jtl: Academic Radiology
      issn: 10766332
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2014
      vid: 21
      iid: 4
      pid: 467
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104037596
        NLM24594418
        2012498879
        10.1016/j.acra.2013.12.011
        NLM24594418
        PMC3952000
        104037596
      ppf: 481
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Comparative statistical properties of expected utility and area under the ROC curve for laboratory studies of observer performance in screening mammography.
      aug:
        au:
          Abbey, Craig K
          Gallas, Brandon D
          Boone, John M
          Niklason, Loren T
          Hadjiiski, Lubomir M
          Sahiner, Berkman
          Samuelson, Frank W
        affil: Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106. Electronic address: abbey@psych.ucsb.edu.
      sug:
        subj:
          Breast Neoplasms Radiography
          Clinical Competence Statistics and Numerical Data
          Mammography Statistics and Numerical Data
          Health Screening Statistics and Numerical Data
          ROC Curve
          Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted Methods
          Diagnosis, Laboratory Statistics and Numerical Data
          Data Analysis, Statistical
          Female
          Human
          Observer Bias
          Reproducibility of Results
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Female
      ab: Rationale and Objectives: Our objective is to determine whether expected utility (EU) and the area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUC) are consistent with one another as endpoints of observer performance studies in mammography. These two measures characterize receiver operator characteristic performance somewhat differently. We compare these two study endpoints at the level of individual reader effects, statistical inference, and components of variance across readers and cases.Materials and Methods: We reanalyze three previously published laboratory observer performance studies that investigate various x-ray breast imaging modalities using EU and AUC. The EU measure is based on recent estimates of relative utility for screening mammography.Results: The AUC and EU measures are correlated across readers for individual modalities (r = 0.93) and differences in modalities (r = 0.94 to 0.98). Statistical inference for modality effects based on multi-reader multi-case analysis is very similar, with significant results (P < .05) in exactly the same conditions. Power analyses show mixed results across studies, with a small increase in power on average for EU that corresponds to approximately a 7% reduction in the number of readers. Despite a large number of crossing receiver operator characteristic curves (59% of readers), modality effects only rarely have opposite signs for EU and AUC (6%).Conclusions: We do not find any evidence of systematic differences between EU and AUC in screening mammography observer studies. Thus, when utility approaches are viable (i.e., an appropriate value of relative utility exists), practical effects such as statistical efficiency may be used to choose study endpoints.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        case study
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N