What is the use? Application of the short form (SF) questionnaires for the evaluation of treatment effects.

Background: Health status has evolved as a clinical outcome measure that is of great interest in medical care. However, there is still debate about the appropriateness of scoring algorithms for the often used short form questionnaires. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate the consequences of the tradi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Quality of Life Research Vol. 22; no. 6; pp. 1225 - 1231
Autores principales: Pelle, Aline J, Kupper, Nina, Mols, Floortje, de Jonge, Peter
Formato: research systematic review Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2013
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104084982&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104084982
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09629343
        GPQ
      jtl: Quality of Life Research
      issn: 09629343
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2013
      vid: 22
      iid: 6
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104084982
        NLM22975926
        2012210077
        10.1007/s11136-012-0266-8
        NLM22975926
        104084982
      ppf: 1225
      ppct: 6
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: What is the use? Application of the short form (SF) questionnaires for the evaluation of treatment effects.
      aug:
        au:
          Pelle, Aline J
          Kupper, Nina
          Mols, Floortje
          de Jonge, Peter
        affil: Department of Medical Psychology & Clinical Psychology, Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases (CoRPS), Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000, LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
      sug:
        subj:
          Health Status Indicators
          Heart Failure Psychosocial Factors
          Questionnaires Standards
          Adult
          Aged
          Algorithms
          Antidepressive Agents Adverse Effects
          Antidepressive Agents Therapeutic Use
          Clinical Trials
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Depression Drug Therapy
          Depression Psychosocial Factors
          Factor Analysis
          Female
          Health Status
          Heart Failure Rehabilitation
          Heart Failure Therapy
          Human
          Male
          Mental Health
          Middle Age
          Netherlands
          Outcome Assessment Statistics and Numerical Data
          Population Surveillance
          Psychometrics
          Quality of Life
          Questionnaires
          Surveys
          Systematic Review
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Background: Health status has evolved as a clinical outcome measure that is of great interest in medical care. However, there is still debate about the appropriateness of scoring algorithms for the often used short form questionnaires. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate the consequences of the traditional scoring procedure based on orthogonal factor rotation for clinical applications by (a) re-evaluating the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness of antidepressants in improving health status in cardiac patients and (b) comparing empirical evidence on depression and health status using orthogonal and oblique factor rotation (alternative scoring method) in a community sample and a heart failure (HF) sample.Methods: This is a systematic literature review and cross-sectional analysis among 1,598 community sample participants and 282 HF patients.Results: Orthogonal rotation artificially forces the mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS) to be unrelated, which is illustrated in two of the three included RCTs. Two RCTs showed improvements in MCS, but no improvement in PCS over time. Cross-sectional analysis in the two datasets showed that employing the alternative scoring algorithm resulted in higher negative correlations of MCS and PCS with depression, and a gradual decline in MCS with each decile of decline in PCS.Conclusion: Our data showed that appropriate carefulness is needed when calculating and interpreting summary scores. The traditional scoring algorithm seems inappropriate to objectively evaluate the effects of interventions on both the MCS and the PCS. Awareness in the design and evaluation of interventions using these outcomes is warranted.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        systematic review
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N