Evaluating recall bias in a case-crossover design estimating risk of injury related to alcohol: data from six countries.

Introduction and Aims: Prior work suggests that recall bias may be a threat to the validity of relative risk estimation of injury due to alcohol consumption, when the case-crossover method is used based on drinking during the same six hours period the week prior to injury as the control period. This...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Drug & Alcohol Review Vol. 32; no. 5; pp. 512 - 519
Main Authors: Ye, Yu, Bond, Jason C, Cherpitel, Cheryl J, Borges, Guilherme, Monteiro, Maristela, Vallance, Kate
Format: research Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2013
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104099723&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104099723
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09595236
        57J
      jtl: Drug & Alcohol Review
      issn: 09595236
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2013
      vid: 32
      iid: 5
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104099723
        NLM23574580
        2012316328
        10.1111/dar.12042
        NLM23574580
        PMC3766498
        104099723
      ppf: 512
      ppct: 7
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Evaluating recall bias in a case-crossover design estimating risk of injury related to alcohol: data from six countries.
      aug:
        au:
          Ye, Yu
          Bond, Jason C
          Cherpitel, Cheryl J
          Borges, Guilherme
          Monteiro, Maristela
          Vallance, Kate
        affil: Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, USA.
      sug:
        subj:
          Alcohol Drinking
          Alcohol Drinking Epidemiology
          Emergency Medical Services
          Memory
          Questionnaires Standards
          Wounds and Injuries Epidemiology
          Adolescence
          Adult
          Canada
          Crossover Design
          Dominican Republic
          Female
          Guatemala
          Guyana
          Human
          Male
          Middle Age
          Nicaragua
          Panama
          Risk Factors
          Statistics Methods
          Wounds and Injuries Diagnosis
          Wounds and Injuries Psychosocial Factors
          Young Adult
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Introduction and Aims: Prior work suggests that recall bias may be a threat to the validity of relative risk estimation of injury due to alcohol consumption, when the case-crossover method is used based on drinking during the same six hours period the week prior to injury as the control period. This work explores the issue of alcohol recall bias used in the case-crossover design.Design and Methods: Data were collected on injury patients from emergency room studies across six countries (Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Guyana, Nicaragua, Panama and Canada), conducted in 2009-2011, each with n ≈ 500 except Canada (n = 249). Recall bias was evaluated comparing drinking during two control periods: the same six hours period the day before versus the week before injury.Results: A greater likelihood of drinking yesterday compared with last week was seen using data from the Dominican Republic, while lower likelihood of drinking yesterday was found in Guatemala and Nicaragua. When the data from all six countries were combined, no differential drinking between the two control periods was observed.Discussion and Conclusions: These findings are in contrast to earlier studies showing a downward recall bias of drinking, and suggest that it may be premature to dismiss the last week case-crossover method as a valid approach to estimating risk of injury related to drinking. However, the heterogeneity across countries suggests that there may be some unexplained measurement error beyond random sampling error.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N