Measuring Enfranchisement: Importance of and Control Over Participation by People With Disabilities.
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties and validity of an expanded set of community enfranchisement items that are suitable for computer adaptive testing. Design: Survey. Setting: Community setting. Participants: Individuals with disabilities (N=1163) were recruited from an onl...
| Publicado en: | Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Vol. 94; no. 11; pp. 2157 - 2166 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
| Formato: | research Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
W B Saunders
Nov2013
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104109592&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 104109592 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00039993 1XL jtl: Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation issn: 00039993 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2013 vid: 94 iid: 11 pid: 1351 pub: W B Saunders place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 104109592 91693687 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.017 NLM23769764 104109592 ppf: 2157 ppct: 9 formats: tig: atl: Measuring Enfranchisement: Importance of and Control Over Participation by People With Disabilities. aug: au: Heinemann, Allen W. Magasi, Susan Bode, Rita K. Hammel, Joy Whiteneck, Gale G. Bogner, Jennifer Corrigan, John D. affil: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL sug: subj: Persons with Disabilities Instrument Validation Computerized Adaptive Testing Evaluation Psychometrics Quality of Life Social Participation Validation Studies Sampling Methods Factor Analysis Surveys Item Analysis Human Funding Source ab: Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties and validity of an expanded set of community enfranchisement items that are suitable for computer adaptive testing. Design: Survey. Setting: Community setting. Participants: Individuals with disabilities (N=1163) were recruited from an online panel generation company (51%), former rehabilitation inpatients (18%), disability community organizations (13%), a registry of rehabilitation patients (10%), and Traumatic Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury Model System facilities (8%). Inclusion criteria were a self-identified disability, aged ≥18 years, and the ability to read and speak English. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measure: Community enfranchisement. Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the 48 enfranchisement items suggested 2 distinct subsets of items: (1) importance of participation and (2) control over participation. Principal components analysis of the residuals suggested that the 2 item sets are unidimensional. Rating scale analysis provided evidence that the 2 item sets fit the Rasch model. Importance and control were moderately correlated with each other and with disability severity. Conclusions: Importance of participation and control over participation define 2 distinct sets of participation enfranchisement. Preliminary evidence supports their validity. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|