Comparison of Dyssynchrony Parameters for VV-Optimization in CRT Patients.

Background Optimization of the interventricular delay (VV-optimization) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients can be performed by evaluation of mechanical dyssynchrony. However, there is no consensus on which method to use. In this study, three conceptually different methods were evalu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology Vol. 36; no. 11; pp. 1382 - 1391
Autores principales: Risum, Niels, Sogaard, Peter, Hansen, Thomas F., Bruun, Niels E., Hoffmann, Soren, Kisslo, Joseph, Jons, Christian, Olsen, Niels T.
Formato: diagnostic images research tables/charts tracings Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Nov2013
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104147702&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104147702
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01478389
        4F8
      jtl: Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology
      issn: 01478389
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2013
      vid: 36
      iid: 11
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104147702
        91615075
        10.1111/pace.12203
        NLM23827016
        104147702
      ppf: 1382
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Comparison of Dyssynchrony Parameters for VV-Optimization in CRT Patients.
      aug:
        au:
          Risum, Niels
          Sogaard, Peter
          Hansen, Thomas F.
          Bruun, Niels E.
          Hoffmann, Soren
          Kisslo, Joseph
          Jons, Christian
          Olsen, Niels T.
        affil: Department of Cardiology, Gentofte University Hospital
      sug:
        subj:
          Heart Failure Therapy
          Pacemaker, Artificial Methods
          Human
          Echocardiography Methods
          Descriptive Statistics
          Intrarater Reliability
          Ventricular Ejection Fraction
          Bundle-Branch Block
          T-Tests
          Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
          Mann-Whitney U Test
          Post Hoc Analysis
          Female
          Male
          Aged
          Middle Age
          Data Analysis Software
          Confidence Intervals
          Aged: 65+ years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Background Optimization of the interventricular delay (VV-optimization) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients can be performed by evaluation of mechanical dyssynchrony. However, there is no consensus on which method to use. In this study, three conceptually different methods were evaluated. Methods Thirty consecutive CRT patients were included. At day 1, patients were atrioventricular and VV optimized by left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) velocity time integral (VTI). At 6 months, 2D strain (2DS) echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) was performed at six different VV-programming delay in steps of 20 ms. LVOT and three indices of dyssynchrony were evaluated at each setting: standard deviation (SD) of time-to-peak strain in 12 segments (2DS-SD), SD of time-to-peak velocities in 12 segments (TDI-SD), and maximal activation delay (AD-max) by cross-correlation analysis (XCA) of TDI-derived myocardial acceleration curves. Results Feasibility was 90% for 2DS-SD and TDI-SD and 97% for AD-max. Coefficients of variation for intraobserver variability were 13% for 2DS-SD, 11% for TDI-SD, and 6% for AD-max. A relative increase in LVOT VTI > 10% was observed in 5/12 (42%) nonresponders and 7/18 (39%) responders to CRT. Optimization by all three dyssynchrony indices significantly increased LVOT VTI compared to simultaneous pacing and optimal setting at day 1 (P < 0.05, all). LVOT VTI was highest when using AD-max, and AD-max showed the best agreement (k = 0.71). Conclusion VV optimization at 6 months acutely benefits both responders and nonresponders; however, dyssynchrony indices do not perform equally well. XCA has a high feasibility and reproducibility and appears to be superior to time-to-peak techniques.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        research
        tables/charts
        tracings
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N