Intonational Means to Mark Verum Focus in German and French.

German and French differ in a number of aspects. Regarding the prosody-pragmatics interface, German is said to have a direct focus-to-accent mapping, which is largely absent in French – owing to strong structural constraints. We used a semi-spontaneous dialogue setting to investigate the intonationa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Language & Speech Vol. 56; no. 4; pp. 461 - 492
Autores principales: Turco, Giuseppina, Dimroth, Christine, Braun, Bettina
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts tracings Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. Dec2013
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104166628&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104166628
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00238309
        3YY
      jtl: Language & Speech
      issn: 00238309
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2013
      vid: 56
      iid: 4
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104166628
        92580793
        92580793
        10.1177/0023830912460506
        104166628
      ppf: 461
      ppct: 31
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Intonational Means to Mark Verum Focus in German and French.
      aug:
        au:
          Turco, Giuseppina
          Dimroth, Christine
          Braun, Bettina
      sug:
        subj:
          Speech Acoustics Evaluation
          Conversation
          Accents and Dialects Germany
          Accents and Dialects France
          Semantics
          Human
          Funding Source
          Speech Sample
          Germany
          Experimental Studies Germany
          Computer-Aided Design
          Interrater Reliability
          Students, Undergraduate Germany
          Students, Undergraduate France
          France
          Computer Simulation Utilization
          Linear Regression
      ab: German and French differ in a number of aspects. Regarding the prosody-pragmatics interface, German is said to have a direct focus-to-accent mapping, which is largely absent in French – owing to strong structural constraints. We used a semi-spontaneous dialogue setting to investigate the intonational marking of Verum Focus, a focus on the polarity of an utterance in the two languages (e.g. the child IS tearing the banknote as an opposite claim to the child is not tearing the banknote). When Verum Focus applies to auxiliaries, pragmatic aspects (i.e. highlighting the contrast) directly compete with structural constraints (e.g. avoiding an accent on phonologically weak elements such as monosyllabic function words). Intonational analyses showed that auxiliaries were predominantly accented in German, as expected. Interestingly, we found a high number of (as yet undocumented) focal accents on phrase-initial auxiliaries in French Verum Focus contexts. When French accent patterns were equally distributed across information structural contexts, relative prominence (in terms of peak height) between initial and final accents was shifted towards initial accents in Verum Focus compared to non-Verum Focus contexts. Our data hence suggest that French also may mark Verum Focus by focal accents but that this tendency is partly overridden by strong structural constraints.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        tracings
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N