Interlaboratory Evaluation of in Vitro Cytotoxicity and Inflammatory Responses to Engineered Nanomaterials: The NIEHS Nano GO Consortium.

Background: Differences in interlaboratory research protocols contribute to the conflicting data in the literature regarding engineered nanomaterial (ENM) bioactivity. Objectives: Grantees of a National Institute of Health Sciences (NIEHS)-funded consortium program performed two phases of in vitro t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Environmental Health Perspectives Vol. 121; no. 6; pp. 683 - 691
Autores principales: Tian Xia, Hamilton Jr., Raymond F., Bonner, James C., Crandall, Edward D., Elder, Alison, Fazlollahi, Farnoosh, Girtsman, Teri A., Kwang Kim, Mitra, Somenath, Ntim, Susana A., Orr, Galya, Tagmount, Mani, Taylor, Alexia J., Telesca, Donatello, Tolic, Ana, Vulpe, Christopher D., Walker, Andrea J., Xiang Wang, Witzmann, Frank A., Nianqiang Wu
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Jun2013
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104183256&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104183256
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00916765
        3B5
      jtl: Environmental Health Perspectives
      issn: 00916765
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2013
      vid: 121
      iid: 6
      pid: 56539
      pub: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
      place: Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104183256
        88197280
        10.1289/ehp.1306561
        NLM23649538
        PMC3672931
        104183256
      ppf: 683
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Interlaboratory Evaluation of in Vitro Cytotoxicity and Inflammatory Responses to Engineered Nanomaterials: The NIEHS Nano GO Consortium.
      aug:
        au:
          Tian Xia
          Hamilton Jr., Raymond F.
          Bonner, James C.
          Crandall, Edward D.
          Elder, Alison
          Fazlollahi, Farnoosh
          Girtsman, Teri A.
          Kwang Kim
          Mitra, Somenath
          Ntim, Susana A.
          Orr, Galya
          Tagmount, Mani
          Taylor, Alexia J.
          Telesca, Donatello
          Tolic, Ana
          Vulpe, Christopher D.
          Walker, Andrea J.
          Xiang Wang
          Witzmann, Frank A.
          Nianqiang Wu
      sug:
        subj:
          Toxicity Tests
          Nanostructures Adverse Effects
          Inflammation Etiology
          Human
          Animal Studies
          In Vitro Studies
          Cell Culture Techniques
          Biological Assay
          Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
          Post Hoc Analysis
          Descriptive Statistics
          Confidence Intervals
          Funding Source
      ab: Background: Differences in interlaboratory research protocols contribute to the conflicting data in the literature regarding engineered nanomaterial (ENM) bioactivity. Objectives: Grantees of a National Institute of Health Sciences (NIEHS)-funded consortium program performed two phases of in vitro testing with selected ENMs in an effort to identify and minimize sources of variability. Methods: Consortium program participants (CPPs) conducted ENM bioactivity evaluations on zinc oxide (ZnO), three forms of titanium dioxide (TiO2), and three forms of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). In addition, CPPs performed bioassays using three mammalian cell lines (BEAS-2B, RLE-6TN, and THP-1) selected in order to cover two different species (rat and human), two different lung epithelial cells (alveolar type II and bronchial epithelial cells), and two different cell types (epithelial cells and macrophages). CPPs also measured cytotoxicity in all cell types while measuring inflammasome activation [interleukin-1β (IL-1β) release] using only THP-1 cells. Results: The overall in vitro toxicity profiles of ENM were as follows: ZnO was cytotoxic to all cell types at ≥ 50 µg/mL, but did not induce IL-1β. TiO2 was not cytotoxic except for the nanobelt form, which was cytotoxic and induced significant IL-1β production in THP-1 cells. MWCNTs did not produce cytotoxicity, but stimulated lower levels of IL-1β production in THP-1 cells, with the original MWCNT producing the most IL-1β. Conclusions: The results provide justification for the inclusion of mechanism-linked bioactivity assays along with traditional cytotoxicity assays for in vitro screening. In addition, the results suggest that conducting studies with multiple relevant cell types to avoid false-negative outcomes is critical for accurate evaluation of ENM bioactivity.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N