NSF DMP Content Analysis: What Are Researchers Saying?
As of January 2011, the National Science Foundation (NSF) has required a data management plan (DMP) as part of all grant proposals. Georgia Tech's librarians and information technologists presented DMP development guidelines to support the requirement and later examined 181 plans submitted in the fi...
| Published in: | Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science & Technology Vol. 39; no. 1; pp. 37 - 39 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Oct/Nov2012
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104187548&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 104187548 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 19316550 BSI jtl: Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science & Technology issn: 19316550 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Oct/Nov2012 vid: 39 iid: 1 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 104187548 2012169141 104187548 ppf: 37 ppct: 2 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: NSF DMP Content Analysis: What Are Researchers Saying? aug: au: Parham, Susan Wells Doty, Chris affil: Head of scholarly communication & digital curation, Georgia Tech Library sug: subj: Science Data Management Foundations Communication Information Storage Strategic Planning Cloud Computing ab: As of January 2011, the National Science Foundation (NSF) has required a data management plan (DMP) as part of all grant proposals. Georgia Tech's librarians and information technologists presented DMP development guidelines to support the requirement and later examined 181 plans submitted in the first eight months of 2011. The review revealed only 22 percent referred to Georgia Tech's institutional repository, SMARTech. The schools submitting the greatest percentage of proposals were not most likely to reference SMARTech, nor was there consistency in referencing the university repository within schools. The language used to describe SMARTech was highly variable, drawn from various sources and widely shared. Public online collaboration tools were also referenced in proposals. The analysis indicates inconsistent understanding of the university's data repository services, the need for consistent descriptive language and the need to target specific schools for outreach, all in partnership with researchers. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|