NSF DMP Content Analysis: What Are Researchers Saying?

As of January 2011, the National Science Foundation (NSF) has required a data management plan (DMP) as part of all grant proposals. Georgia Tech's librarians and information technologists presented DMP development guidelines to support the requirement and later examined 181 plans submitted in the fi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science & Technology Vol. 39; no. 1; pp. 37 - 39
Main Authors: Parham, Susan Wells, Doty, Chris
Format: Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Oct/Nov2012
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104187548&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104187548
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        19316550
        BSI
      jtl: Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science & Technology
      issn: 19316550
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct/Nov2012
      vid: 39
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104187548
        2012169141
        104187548
      ppf: 37
      ppct: 2
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: NSF DMP Content Analysis: What Are Researchers Saying?
      aug:
        au:
          Parham, Susan Wells
          Doty, Chris
        affil: Head of scholarly communication & digital curation, Georgia Tech Library
      sug:
        subj:
          Science
          Data Management
          Foundations
          Communication
          Information Storage
          Strategic Planning
          Cloud Computing
      ab: As of January 2011, the National Science Foundation (NSF) has required a data management plan (DMP) as part of all grant proposals. Georgia Tech's librarians and information technologists presented DMP development guidelines to support the requirement and later examined 181 plans submitted in the first eight months of 2011. The review revealed only 22 percent referred to Georgia Tech's institutional repository, SMARTech. The schools submitting the greatest percentage of proposals were not most likely to reference SMARTech, nor was there consistency in referencing the university repository within schools. The language used to describe SMARTech was highly variable, drawn from various sources and widely shared. Public online collaboration tools were also referenced in proposals. The analysis indicates inconsistent understanding of the university's data repository services, the need for consistent descriptive language and the need to target specific schools for outreach, all in partnership with researchers.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N