A framework for the analysis of heterogeneity of treatment effect in patient-centered outcomes research.

Individuals vary in their response to a treatment. Understanding this heterogeneity of treatment effect is critical for evaluating how well a treatment can be expected to work for an individual or a subgroup of individuals. An overemphasis on hypothesis testing has resulted in a dichotomy of all het...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Vol. 66; no. 8; pp. 818 - 826
Autores principales: Varadhan, Ravi, Segal, Jodi B, Boyd, Cynthia M, Wu, Albert W, Weiss, Carlos O
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2013
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104189207&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104189207
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        08954356
        20C
      jtl: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      issn: 08954356
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2013
      vid: 66
      iid: 8
      pid: 82545
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104189207
        NLM23651763
        2012174868
        10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.009
        NLM23651763
        PMC4450361
        104189207
      ppf: 818
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: A framework for the analysis of heterogeneity of treatment effect in patient-centered outcomes research.
      aug:
        au:
          Varadhan, Ravi
          Segal, Jodi B
          Boyd, Cynthia M
          Wu, Albert W
          Weiss, Carlos O
        affil: Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; The Center on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Electronic address: rvaradhan@jhmi.edu.
      sug:
        subj:
          Health Services Research Methods
          Data Analysis, Statistical
          Outcome Assessment Methods
          Clinical Trials
          Human
          Meta Analysis
          Reproducibility of Results
      ab: Individuals vary in their response to a treatment. Understanding this heterogeneity of treatment effect is critical for evaluating how well a treatment can be expected to work for an individual or a subgroup of individuals. An overemphasis on hypothesis testing has resulted in a dichotomy of all heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses into confirmatory (hypothesis testing) and exploratory (hypothesis finding) analyses. This limited view of heterogeneity of treatment effect is inadequate for creating evidence that is useful for informing patient-centered decisions. An expanded framework for heterogeneity of treatment effect assessment is proposed. It recognizes four distinct goals of heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses: hypothesis testing, hypothesis finding, reporting subgroup effects for meta-analysis, and individual-level prediction. Accordingly, two new types of heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses are proposed: descriptive and predictive. Descriptive heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses report treatment effects for prespecified subgroups in accordance with prospectively specified analytic strategy. They need not be powered to detect heterogeneity of treatment effect. They emphasize estimation and reporting of subgroup effects rather than hypothesis testing. Sampling properties (e.g., standard error) of descriptive analysis can be characterized, thus facilitating meta-analysis of subgroup effects. Predictive heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses estimate probabilities of beneficial and adverse responses of individuals to treatments and facilitates optimal treatment decisions for different types of individuals. Procedures are also suggested to improve reliability of heterogeneity of treatment effect assessment from observational studies. Heterogeneity of treatment effect analysis should be identified as confirmatory, descriptive, exploratory, or predictive analysis. Evidence should be interpreted in a manner consistent with the analytic goal.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N