Internet-based multiple mini-interviews for candidate selection for graduate entry programmes.

Context Multiple mini-interviews (MMIs) have been used by The University of Sydney graduate medical and dental programmes since 2006. In 2011, interviews with international candidates were conducted using Skype ( iMMI), whereas interviews with local candidates were conducted in person. We determined...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Medical Education Vol. 47; no. 8; pp. 801 - 811
Autores principales: Tiller, David, O'Mara, Deborah, Rothnie, Imogene, Dunn, Stewart, Lee, Lily, Roberts, Chris
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Aug2013
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104190889&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104190889
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03080110
        ESF
      jtl: Medical Education
      issn: 03080110
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2013
      vid: 47
      iid: 8
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104190889
        88937039
        10.1111/medu.12224
        NLM23837426
        104190889
      ppf: 801
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Internet-based multiple mini-interviews for candidate selection for graduate entry programmes.
      aug:
        au:
          Tiller, David
          O'Mara, Deborah
          Rothnie, Imogene
          Dunn, Stewart
          Lee, Lily
          Roberts, Chris
        affil: The University of Sydney
      sug:
        subj:
          World Wide Web
          Interviews Methods
          Student Selection
          Students, Medical
          Students, Dental
          Videoconferencing
          Student Attitudes
          Australia
          Pilot Studies
          Cost Benefit Analysis
          Data Analysis Software
          Two-Way Analysis of Variance
          Descriptive Statistics
          Nonparametric Statistics
          Scales
          Models, Statistical
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Male
          Female
      ab: Context Multiple mini-interviews (MMIs) have been used by The University of Sydney graduate medical and dental programmes since 2006. In 2011, interviews with international candidates were conducted using Skype ( iMMI), whereas interviews with local candidates were conducted in person. We determined whether the MMI scores derived from both methods were comparable. We describe the feasibility, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of the iMMI. Methods We compared 2011 international student internet-based iMMI results with data from 2009 international student MMIs and 2011 local student MMIs. Analyses of variance ( anovas) were used to investigate equivalence of the two formats by exploring whether the medium of interviewing resulted in significantly different mean scores and variance for the in-person MMI and the iMMI. Acceptability of the process was informed by feedback surveys from interviewers and candidates, and cost savings were estimated. Results No significant difference was found between the 2011 iMMI scores for international candidates and MMI scores in 2009 (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the MMI scores for local and international candidates in 2011 (p > 0.05); the MMI scores for international candidates had greater variation (p < 0.01). Using generalisability theory, the reliability of the nine-question iMMI was 0.76 and for the MMI was 0.70. Delivery of the iMMI occurred smoothly and candidates and interviewers gave positive feedback on its format and delivery. Cost savings have been estimated to be over AU$50 000, representing an 84% saving. Conclusions We believe this is the first study reporting an internet-based MMI for a high stakes interview. We have shown that interviewers were able to make valid and reliable decisions about candidates through the iMMI in a process that was acceptable to participants, producing comparable results to the in-person MMI with a saving of resources. The slightly wider variance in iMMI scores warrants further investigation.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N