Brief Report: Comparability of DSM-IV and DSM-5 ASD Research Samples.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5) criteria for ASD have been criticized for being too restrictive, especially for more cognitively-able individuals. It is unclear, however, if high-functioning individuals deemed eligible for research via standardized diagnostic assessments would meet DSM-5 c...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders Vol. 43; no. 5; pp. 1236 - 1243 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
May2013
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104268021&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 104268021 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 01623257 AUT jtl: Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders issn: 01623257 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: May2013 vid: 43 iid: 5 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 104268021 86879233 10.1007/s10803-012-1665-y NLM23011251 104268021 ppf: 1236 ppct: 7 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Brief Report: Comparability of DSM-IV and DSM-5 ASD Research Samples. aug: au: Mazefsky, C. McPartland, J. Gastgeb, H. Minshew, N. affil: Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Webster Hall, Suite 300, 3811 O'Hara Street Pittsburgh 15213 USA sug: subj: DSM Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis Human Child, Preschool Child Adolescence Adult Middle Age Descriptive Statistics Male Female Clinical Assessment Tools Funding Source Child, Preschool: 2-5 years Child: 6-12 years Adolescent: 13-18 years Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Male Female ab: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5) criteria for ASD have been criticized for being too restrictive, especially for more cognitively-able individuals. It is unclear, however, if high-functioning individuals deemed eligible for research via standardized diagnostic assessments would meet DSM-5 criteria. This study investigated the impact of DSM-5 on the diagnostic status of 498 high-functioning participants with ASD research diagnoses. The percent of participants satisfying all DSM-5-requirements varied significantly with reliance on data from the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS; 33 %) versus Autism Diagnostic Interview- Revised (ADI-R; 83 %), highlighting the impact of diagnostic methodology on ability to document DSM-5 symptoms. Utilizing combined ADOS/ADI-R data, 93 % of participants met DSM-5 criteria, which suggests likely continuity between DSM-IV and DSM-5 research samples characterized with these instruments in combination. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|