Alternative computer mouse designs: Performance, posture, and subjective evaluations for college students aged 18-25.

BACKGROUND: Students are faced with work demands requiring intense computer use throughout the week, often with cumulative hourly use per day exceeding that of adult workers. Extended daily computer use has been associated with a reported increase of musculoskeletal symptoms for college-aged student...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Work Vol. 44; pp. 115 - 123
Autores principales: Feathers, David J., Rollings, Kimberly, Hedge, Alan
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. 2013 Supplement 1
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104310005&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104310005
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10519815
        3RC
      jtl: Work
      issn: 10519815
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2013 Supplement 1
      vid: 44
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104310005
        104310005
        2011921836
        10.3233/WOR-121487
        NLM23241688
        104310005
      ppf: 115
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Alternative computer mouse designs: Performance, posture, and subjective evaluations for college students aged 18-25.
      aug:
        au:
          Feathers, David J.
          Rollings, Kimberly
          Hedge, Alan
        affil: Department of Design and Environmental Analysis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Students, College New York
          Mouse (Computer)
          Equipment Design
          Human
          Adolescence
          Adult
          Software
          Experimental Studies
          Female
          Male
          New York
          Anthropometry
          Questionnaires
          Data Analysis Software
          Chi Square Test
          Analysis of Variance
          Funding Source
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: BACKGROUND: Students are faced with work demands requiring intense computer use throughout the week, often with cumulative hourly use per day exceeding that of adult workers. Extended daily computer use has been associated with a reported increase of musculoskeletal symptoms for college-aged students. New mouse designs offer alternative movement and postural strategies to potentially mitigate musculoskeletal stress for students. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the use of alternative computer mouse designs by college-aged students (18-25) through a precision task (point-and-click an on-screen target). Wrist movements, hand posture, and associated subjective user data were collected across innovative mouse designs to understand the physical impact and basic usability issues for this population. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-one (21) healthy, right handed students (11 female; 10 male) were enrolled in this study. METHODS: Five mouse designs were assessed by investigating hand fit, wrist movements, and subjective accounts of ease of use, perceived control, comfort and aesthetics. Human performance was captured for each mouse design in terms of peak velocity, average movement time, and fastest movement direction using an electrogoniometer as participants performed the ISO 9241 multipoint standard Fitts' task using the Generalized Fitts' Law Model Builder software (GFLMB v.1.1C; [1]) within a zero-error setting (point-and-click task). Hand measurements were taken in both standardized anthropometric positions and adapted hand positions on five alternative mouse designs for a total of seven sets of measurements for each participant. Subjective data was collected through a series of questionnaires that were administered before, during, and after the mouse tasks. RESULTS: Results for human performance, distal upper extremity posture (hand/wrist), and subjective data such as overall preference, ease of use, perceived control, and comfort are given for this population. Wrist extension exceeded 30 degrees for over 50% of the total movement time for 3 out of 5 mouse designs. Postural variations in hand molding of the metacarpophalangeal arch (MCP angle) across mouse design was shown to be related to mouse control and ease of use. Subjective evaluations showed no differences between males and females, and overall preference was correlated to subjective evaluations of comfort, ease of use, perceived control, and, to a lesser extent, product attractiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Individual performance across the alternative mouse designs in this study showed overall faster movement speeds than the `conventional' mouse design, while exhibiting similar wrist posture behavior for extension and ulnar deviation. Wrist extension is a risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries such as carpal tunnel syndrome. The current ergonomic standard calls for wrist extension to be below 30 degrees, and 3 of the 5 mouse designs exceeded this value. Guidance and adherence to proper use techniques for alternative mouse designs for this population is warranted and will help mitigate potential musculoskeletal risks.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N