Convergent validity of MCMI-III clinical syndrome scales.
Objectives. This study tested the convergent validity of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III) clinical syndrome scales. Design. Cross-sectional survey. Methods. Using a sample of 186 substance abusers from one single town referred for assessment, convergent and discriminant validi...
| Published in: | British Journal of Clinical Psychology Vol. 51; no. 2; pp. 172 - 185 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jun2012
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104353524&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 104353524 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 01446657 99B jtl: British Journal of Clinical Psychology issn: 01446657 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jun2012 vid: 51 iid: 2 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 104353524 75164474 10.1111/j.2044-8260.2011.02019.x NLM22574802 104353524 ppf: 172 ppct: 13 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Convergent validity of MCMI-III clinical syndrome scales. aug: au: Hesse, Morten Guldager, Steen Holm Linneberg, Inger affil: Center for Alcohol and Drug Research, University of Aarhus, Denmark sug: subj: Criterion-Related Validity Substance Abuse Classification Human Scales Cross Sectional Studies Persons with Substance Use Disorders Descriptive Statistics Psychopathology Denmark Adolescence Adult Middle Age Male Female Factor Analysis Confidence Intervals kappa Statistic Data Analysis Software Funding Source Adolescent: 13-18 years Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Male Female ab: Objectives. This study tested the convergent validity of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III) clinical syndrome scales. Design. Cross-sectional survey. Methods. Using a sample of 186 substance abusers from one single town referred for assessment, convergent and discriminant validity of the MCMI-III and Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) diagnoses was conducted. Additional measures included the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and the Beck Anxiety Inventory. Results. A single Axis I factor based on the raw scores correlated adequately with the factor based on the other scales ( r= .85), whereas the correlation between the factor based on the MCMI-III baserate scores was somewhat lower ( r= .74), but still indicated substantial convergent validity. For individual disorders, area under the curve (AUC) analyses suggested that the convergent validity of the MCMI-III and the MINI was adequate. The raw score scales were superior to the baserate adjusted scores in all but one case. Discriminant validity was good for alcohol and drug dependence, moderate for major depression and delusion, and poor for thought disorder and anxiety. Conclusions. The MCMI-III clinical syndrome scales generally measure the constructs they were intended for. The data did not support that the adjustments used in calculating the baserate scores improved validity. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|