Reliability of the Danish version of the McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment for observation-based measures during meals.
Aim: To establish measurement equivalence in terms of reliability of the Danish version of the Canadian McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment (MISA) for use by occupational therapists. Methods: A cross-sectional two-rater and test-retest design was applied. A total of 102 elderly medical patients were...
| Publicado en: | Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy Vol. 19; no. 6; pp. 488 - 497 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Nov2012
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104374812&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 104374812 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 11038128 BD9 jtl: Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy issn: 11038128 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Nov2012 vid: 19 iid: 6 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 104374812 82560673 10.3109/11038128.2012.674552 NLM22545775 104374812 ppf: 488 ppct: 9 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Reliability of the Danish version of the McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment for observation-based measures during meals. aug: au: Hansen, Tina Lambert, Heather C. Faber, Jens affil: Department of Occupational Therapy, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark sug: subj: Reliability Instrument Validation Eating Motor Skills Evaluation Clinical Assessment Tools Denmark Human Funding Source Cross Sectional Studies Intraclass Correlation Coefficient Interrater Reliability Male Female Aged Aged, 80 and Over Descriptive Statistics Data Analysis Software Aged: 65+ years Aged, 80 & over Male Female ab: Aim: To establish measurement equivalence in terms of reliability of the Danish version of the Canadian McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment (MISA) for use by occupational therapists. Methods: A cross-sectional two-rater and test-retest design was applied. A total of 102 elderly medical patients were included consecutively, and were video-recorded during a meal. Raters were paired randomly for each video-case, which was re-scored within three to eight weeks. Reliability was evaluated with the intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), the standard error of measurement (SEM), the smallest detectable change (SDC), and limits of agreement (LOA). Results: Inter-rater reliability was good to excellent (ICC 1.1 0.61-0.84) and intra-rater reliability was excellent (ICC 3.1 0.84-0.93). For the total scale, SEM was 7% between raters and 4% in repeated measurement by the same rater. For the absolute total scale range on 86 points, the SDC was 15.8 between raters and 10.3 in repeated measurement by the same rater. Conclusions: The reliability of the Danish MISA equals the original version and is suitable for clinical practice. When extending the evaluation of the reproducibility, weaker precision was evident when measurements are repeated by different raters than by the same rater. Therefore further investigation of rater effects is recommended. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|