Team performance in resuscitation teams: comparison and critique of two recently developed scoring tools.
Background and Aim: Following high profile errors resulting in patient harm and attracting negative publicity, the healthcare sector has begun to focus on training non-technical teamworking skills as one way of reducing the rate of adverse events. Within the area of resuscitation, two tools have bee...
| Publicado en: | Resuscitation Vol. 83; no. 12; pp. 1478 - 1484 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | research Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
Dec2012
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104379048&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 104379048 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 03009572 3PQ jtl: Resuscitation issn: 03009572 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2012 vid: 83 iid: 12 pid: 1004 pub: Elsevier B.V. artinfo: ui: 104379048 NLM22561464 2011737479 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.04.015 NLM22561464 PMC3500685 104379048 ppf: 1478 ppct: 6 formats: tig: atl: Team performance in resuscitation teams: comparison and critique of two recently developed scoring tools. aug: au: McKay A Walker ST Brett SJ Vincent C Sevdalis N McKay, Anthony Walker, Susanna T Brett, Stephen J Vincent, Charles Sevdalis, Nick affil: Department of Resuscitation and Outreach, St. Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, UK sug: subj: Clinical Competence Statistics and Numerical Data Multidisciplinary Care Team Resuscitation Standards Human Observer Bias ab: Background and Aim: Following high profile errors resulting in patient harm and attracting negative publicity, the healthcare sector has begun to focus on training non-technical teamworking skills as one way of reducing the rate of adverse events. Within the area of resuscitation, two tools have been developed recently aiming to assess these skills - TEAM and OSCAR. The aims of the study reported here were:Methods: The study consisted of two phases - reliability assessment; and content comparison, and correlation. Assessments were made by two resuscitation experts, who watched 24 pre-recorded resuscitation simulations, and independently rated team behaviours using both tools. The tools were critically appraised, and correlation between overall score surrogates was assessed.Results: Both OSCAR and TEAM achieved high levels of inter-rater reliability (in the form of adequate intra-class coefficients) and minor significant differences between Wilcoxon tests. Comparison of the scores from both tools demonstrated a high degree of correlation (and hence concurrent validity). Finally, critique of each tool highlighted differences in length and complexity.Conclusion: Both OSCAR and TEAM can be used to assess resuscitation teams in a simulated environment, with the tools correlating well with one another. We envisage a role for both tools - with TEAM giving a quick, global assessment of the team, but OSCAR enabling more detailed breakdown of the assessment, facilitating feedback, and identifying areas of weakness for future training. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|